ESCAP logo
Home Site Map Index Contact
 
About US Media Centre Members Programmes Documents Publications Jobs
Search:
More Options | Search Tips
Bangkok, Thailand  
  Home > Statistics Division > WGSE, 11th session

Statistics Division, UNESCAP
About us
Statistics Development
 
Bullet Statistics for monitoring MDGs
Bullet Statistics on disability
Bullet Statistics on informal sector and informal employment
Bullet Microdata management
Data Centre
Statistical Publications
Statistical Newsletter
Committee on Poverty Reduction
Meetings
Contact Us
Related Links
Calendar of statistical meetings in Asia and the Pacific
National Statistical Offices in Asia and the Pacific
Statistical Institute for Asia and the Pacific, Tokyo
United Nations Statistics Division, New York
Millennium Development Goals Asia Pacific
 
Working Group of Statistical Experts, 11th Session
Bangkok, 23-26 November 1999

STAT/WGSE.11/9
17 November 1999
ENGLISH ONLY

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMISSION FOR ASIA AND THE PACIFIC

Working Group of Statistical Experts
Eleventh session
23-26 November 1999
Bangkok

Fighting Poverty in Asia and the Pacific: the Poverty Reduction Strategy of the Asian Development Bank
Contents
ABBREVIATIONS
  1. THE MISSION
    1. Poverty Reduction-the Overarching Objective Building on Success
    2. Building on Success
  2. THE CHALLENGE OF POVERTY REDUCTION
    1. The Nature of Poverty
    2. A Framework for Poverty Reduction
    3. Key Elements of the Framework
  3. THE STRATEGY
    1. Poverty Analysis
    2. Country Strategies
    3. Project Typology
    4. Program and Lending Targets
    5. Selection of Projects
    6. Cross-cutting Priorities
    7. Sector Priorities
    8. Using New Tools
    9. Monitoring Impact
    10. Coordination Among Funding Agencies
  4. A PROGRAM FOR ACTION
    1. Retooling for Poverty Reduction
    2. New Instruments
    3. Program and Lending Targets
    4. Working with Partners
    5. Monitoring Progress in Poverty Reduction
    6. Review of the Strategy

APPENDIXES


ABBREVIATIONS
ADB Asian Development Bank
PRC People's Republic of China
ECD early childhood development
HIV/AIDS human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome
NGO nongovernment organization
UNDP United Nations Development Programme
I. THE MISSION
A. Poverty Reduction-the Overarching Objective
1. Poverty is an unacceptable human condition. It is not immutable; public policy and action can, and must, eliminate poverty.  This is what development is all about.
2. Close to 900 million of the world's poor (i.e., those who survive on less than $1 a day) live in the Asian and Pacific region (Appendix1). Nearly one in three Asians is poor.  Although the proportion of people below the poverty line had been declining, the trends in poverty reduction have recently worsened. Population growth is also adding to the absolute number of poor.  South Asia, one of the poorest subregions in the world, now has more than half a billion poor people, of whom 450 million are in India.  The People's Republic of China has 225 million poor, and about 55 million more are in Southeast Asia, (where in the wake of the Asian crisis, over 10 million have joined the ranks of the poor).  Many people in the Central Asian republics have slipped into poverty with the economic disruptions of transition. The small island countries of the Pacific, despite their relatively higher per capita income, remain vulnerable because they are remote, prone to natural disasters, and have limited ability to deal with external economic shocks.
3. Until recently, trends in poverty reduction in the region had been positive, especially in East and Southeast Asia. However, since the Asian financial crisis in 1997, declines in gross domestic product of the economies worst affected, and carry-over effects in other countries, have stalled progress.  Absolute poverty has increased in the crisis-affected countries, and the poor (and particularly their children) have suffered the most.  More ominously, the social consequences of the crisis are likely to be felt long after these economies return to solid growth.
4. As an institution whose purpose is the economic development of the region, the Asian Development Bank (ADB) has always been concerned with poverty reduction.  Beginning with a focus on economic growth, ADB has progressively expanded its approach to encompass a wide range of social and environmental concerns.1/  The experience gained in this process by ADB and its members has given rise to confidence unthinkable even a decade ago: that absolute poverty can be eradicated.  This realization, and the knowledge that development continues to bypass so many people in the region, calls for an even sharper focus of our efforts.  These considerations drive ADB to make elimination of poverty its principal raison d'être.

1/ As outlined in ADB's first Medium-Term Strategic Framework (1992-1995), the five strategic development objectives were promoting economic growth, supporting human development, reducing poverty, improving the status of women, and managing natural resources and the environment soundly.
5. ADB supports the International Development Targets established at a series of world summit meetings in the 1990s (e.g., reducing by half the proportion of people in extreme poverty).  In November 1997, Asian and Pacific ministers agreed to accelerate implementation of the Agenda for Action on Social Development in the regional members of the Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP).  The agenda's targets (e.g., eradicating absolute poverty in the region by 2010) set clear directions for governments and the international community (Appendix 1).  However, these targets need review in the light of the Asian crisis. ADB will work with members to develop credible regional targets for poverty reduction.
6. Because the vision is an Asian and Pacific region free of poverty, ADB has a clear and single-minded mission. Reduction of poverty is no longer just one of five objectives, it is ADB's overarching goal. To this end, the other strategic objectives (i.e., economic growth, human development, sound environmental management, and improving the status of women) will be pursued in ways that contribute most effectively to poverty reduction.  The fundamental shift will affect every aspect and level of ADB's operations. This strategy paper sets out the ways in which these changes will be implemented.
B. Building on Success
7. In attacking poverty, ADB builds on the region's success over the last three decades. While this success has varied between and within individual countries, the region overall has dramatically changed.  In the early 1970s, more than half the population of the region was poor, average life expectancy was 48 years, and only 40 percent of the adult population was literate. Today, the percentage of poor people has decreased to nearly one third of the population, life expectancy has increased to 65 years, and 70 percent of the adults are literate. Despite an increase in total population from 1.8 billion to 3.0 billion, the number of poor people has fallen slightly from over 1 billion to under 900 million.
8. ADB has contributed to these achievements. It has financed investments and policy reforms aimed at promoting growth and employment and, especially in the 1990s, focused on human development, gender equity, and environmental protection. In addition, ADB has supported projects that directly target the poor (e.g., for basic education, nutrition, health, and family planning services) or establish mechanisms to protect vulnerable groups (including the disabled).  It has promoted research on poverty issues, led sector-focused policy dialogue on the causes and impact of poverty, and strengthened institutional capacity in government agencies.
9. Over the years, ADB has learned much about how to address the various dimensions of poverty. For example, in the health sector, instead of merely funding equipment and civil works, ADB now invests more in training and management systems.2/  And increasingly, emphasis is given to consulting with beneficiaries. However, much more needs to be done to involve stakeholders in project design and implementation.  When trying to improve the status of women, ADB has found its interventions to be insufficiently effective because project design assumed institutional capacity that did not, in fact, exist.3/   The paucity of female staff in project entities was often overlooked; likewise, the difficulty of recruiting or retaining women staff in rural areas in the absence of women-friendly facilities (e.g., housing, travel, security). Now, projects pertaining to women are designed with these problems in mind.  In microfinance, which is a powerful means of poverty reduction, ADB's earlier reliance on subsidized credit has given way to the realization that the poor were not always the actual beneficiaries.  The emphasis now is on working with nongovernment organizations (NGOs) and private sector institutions to improve outreach and delivery of microfinance services.

2/ This was accompanied by a dramatic increase since 1991 in the share of health sector lending devoted to primary health care and population activities. (Policy for the Health Sector, February 1999).
3/Policy on Gender and Development, May 1998.>
10. In helping to reduce poverty in the region, ADB draws on strengths that equip it uniquely for the task.  These include the exclusive focus on Asia and the Pacific; regional location; and majority shareholding of regional members (and, hence, greater ownership by them of ADB's strategic orientation).  At the same time, the participation of nonregional members ensures that global perspectives are brought to bear on regional development issues.  ADB undertakes grant-financed technical assistance, public sector lending, and private sector operations under a single roof, and can take advantage of synergies that result. ADB's well-defined policy on governance issues and its success in promoting subregional cooperation are of growing relevance in the fight against poverty.  ADB's response to the Asian crisis, in particular measures to mitigate the impacts on the poor, also demonstrated the institution's ability to effectively address questions of social protection.
11. While the primary responsibility for poverty reduction rests with countries themselves, as the region's premier development institution, ADB can be a powerful ally of borrowing members in their war against poverty.  ADB's intellectual and financial contributions can play a crucial catalytic role in reinforcing national efforts to reduce poverty.  ADB therefore rededicates itself to the eradication of poverty in the region. The Poverty Reduction Strategy embodies ADB's commitment to this massive task.
II. THE CHALLENGE OF POVERTY REDUCTION
A.The Nature of Poverty
12. In the past, ADB relied heavily on income level as the basic measure of poverty.  However, there is now universal agreement that dimensions of poverty far transcend this traditional definition. In ADB's view, poverty is a deprivation of essential assets and opportunities to which every human is entitled.  Everyone should have access to basic education and primary health services. Poor households have the right to sustain themselves by their labor and be reasonably rewarded, as well as having some protection from external shocks. Beyond income and basic services, individuals and societies are also poor-and tend to remain so-if they are not empowered to participate in making the decisions that shape their lives.  Poverty is thus better measured in terms of basic education; health care; nutrition; water and sanitation; as well as income, employment, and wages.  Such measures must also serve as a proxy for other important intangibles such as feelings of powerlessness and lack of freedom to participate.
13. In practice, the most broadly used standard for measuring poverty will continue to be the adequate consumption of food and other essentials. This yardstick (the poverty line) varies from country to country, depending on income and cultural values. While national measurements are essential for measuring the impact of efforts to reduce poverty, ADB's priority is on absolute poverty, and international comparisons will also be necessary.4/

4/ Despite inherent weaknesses, measures such as the "dollar-a-day" poverty line and the UNDP's Human Development Index and Human Poverty Index of the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) will continue to be used (Appendix 1). However, the need to refine these measures in the context of the Asian and Pacific region will be examined.
B. A Framework for Poverty Reduction5/
14. The poor are not a homogenous group.  Just as the nature of poverty is diverse, so too are its causes and victims.  The poor may not have acquired essential assets because they live in a remote or resource-poor area; or because they are vulnerable on account of age, health, living environment, or occupation.  They may be denied access to assets because they belong to an ethnic minority or a community considered socially inferior, or simply because they are female or disabled. At a broader level, poverty may stem from situations where gross inequality of assets persists because of vested interests and entrenched power structures.  Finally, essential assets may not be available to the poor because of the lack of political will, inadequate governance, and inappropriate public policies and programs.
15. The primary responsibility for finding solutions to poverty lies with countries themselves (para.11), but success will depend on the united efforts of government and civil society, and on strong and sustained support from the international community.  For all stakeholders, the strategies chosen to reduce poverty must be comprehensive enough to address all of its many causes.  For this reason, ADB sees the twin pillars of pro-poor,6/ sustainable economic growth and social development as the key elements in any framework for reducing poverty.  Successful achievement of either element requires sound macroeconomic management and good governance,the third pillar. Together, the three pillars result in socially inclusive development.

5/ This framework takes into account the conclusions of Reducing Poverty: Findings and Implications - A Report of Consultations in Selected Developing Member Countries of the Asian Development Bank (ADB, 1999, Manila).
6/ Growth is pro-poor when it is labor absorbing, and accompanied by policies and programs that mitigate inequalities and facilitate income and employment generation for the poor, particularly women and other traditionally excluded groups.
16. However, for socially inclusive development to be achieved, better understanding is needed of the environmental implications of policies to reduce poverty, and of the impacts on the poor of environmental policies.  The poverty-environment nexus has, essentially, two broad components.  On one hand, are the "brown issues" involving polluting industries that locate in areas populated by the poor on account of lax regulation and enforcement.  Also included in this category is the air and water pollution that occurs in megacities, where the poor live in the worst affected localities.  On the other hand, are the "green issues" of deforestation, rapid depletion of natural resources, and land degradation.  Both sets of issues have a direct bearing on the deepening of poverty.
17. Within this general framework, poverty-reducing interventions can be short term, such as those that sustain the supply of basic services to the poor during emergencies (as in the recent Asian crisis); medium term, such as those that help address structural issues affecting delivery of basic services and other targeted poverty interventions; or long term, such as those that stimulate pro-poor growth and encourage expansion of the private sector.
18. ADB is mainly concerned with interventions having medium- or long-term impact.  ADB's strength lies in financing relatively large investments, as well as in conducting policy dialogue with governments in support of policy reform.  While physical investments contribute directly to poverty reduction, the policy and institutional environment is also of great importance for sustainable poverty reduction.  ADB will therefore adopt a systematic approach to poverty reduction by promoting policy reforms, assisting the development of physical and institutional capacity, and designing projects/programs to better target poverty.
19. Reducing poverty and inequality is a humanitarian priority; it also promotes economic growth.  ADB's borrowers require sound economic justification for the loans they take.  Experience clearly demonstrates, though, that investments in areas such as education, microfinance, and health not only have an impact on poverty but also stimulate economic growth.  Developing human and social capital increases political stability, raises productivity, and enhances international competitiveness, leading to faster growth.
C. Key Elements of the Framework
1. Pro-poor, Sustainable Economic Growth
20. East Asia, where most countries reduced their incidence of poverty by half or more in just two decades, provides ample proof of the importance of economic growth for poverty reduction.  Despite the Asian crisis, these countries have shown how robust growth can reduce poverty.  Growth increased the demand for labor, which in turn expanded economic opportunities and raised worker productivity and wages.  It also expanded public revenues that could be used for basic education, health care, and infrastructure.  Outward-oriented policies in East Asia led to labor-absorbing growth, and the resulting expansion in employment opportunities brought large numbers of women into the labor force, with important consequences for poverty reduction and the status of women.  The rise in female participation in school and the workforce slowed population growth through lower fertility rates.  The increase in national income was used to expand investment in human capital and improve access of the poor to basic services.  Further increases in productivity and declines in population growth followed.
21. The lesson is clear: growth can reduce poverty by generating employment and incomes, and labor intensive growth can reduce it even faster.  Thus, policies that encourage labor intensive growth are powerful pro-poor measures. Such policies include, in particular, the removal of market-distorting interventions, such as overvalued exchange rates, import and/or export restrictions, credit subsidies, and reliance on state-owned enterprises.  Other policies that fall in this category are development of a conducive environment for the private sector, and programs (e.g., microfinance and "workfare"7/) aimed at increasing employment and income generating opportunities for women and other groups that may be outside the formal labor force.  Infrastructure development can also make a considerable contribution to growth through job creation and improvement of access to economic activities and basic social services. Similarly, opportunities for self-employment by the poor must be promoted. Inflation and (as seen recently in the region) economic crises also have a severe impact on the poor.  Consequently, sound macroeconomic management is essential for sustained reduction of poverty.

7/ Workfare programs seek to reduce poverty by providing low-wage work to those who need it. Such programs have often been used in times of crises, when large numbers of the able-bodied poor become unemployed.
22. The private sector, the engine of growth, can also play a direct role in poverty reduction.  It can participate in physical and social infrastructure, including provision of basic services that will benefit the poor (thus freeing resources for the public sector).  For the private sector to contribute more effectively to the delivery of such services, an enabling environment must be established and the financial sector developed.  As the role of the private sector expands, that of the government should shift from owner and producer to facilitator and regulator.  Indeed, an effective regulatory framework becomes critical to promote competition, enforce fair practices and standards, and ensure that essential services reach the poor. Governments must also monitor the social impacts of privatization to see that retrenchment, redeployment, or compensation programs are appropriate.  ADB's Private Sector Development Strategy is thus timely and directly relevant to poverty reduction.
23. Market-driven growth processes typically benefit richer areas, where infrastructure and human capital are already reasonably well advanced.  For poorer areas, public investment is generally necessary, especially in rural areas, which generally have excess labor.  Similarly, specific interventions are needed to provide the rural poor or urban unemployed with access to key services and opportunities for self-employment.
24. Another important way to accelerate growth is regional and subregional cooperation, which offers larger markets, economies of scale, and division of labor.  Such cooperation is especially useful for small countries with limited options.  Cooperation may work best at the subregional level, as in the Greater Mekong Subregion, the "growth triangles"8/ pioneered by ADB, and in the Central Asian republics.  It is also useful in other ways, such as in the fight against disease (e.g., tuberculosis, malaria, and HIV/AIDS), and in the sharing of ideas.

8/ Such as the Brunei Darussalam-Indonesia-Malaysia-Philippines-East Asian Growth Area and the Indonesia-Malaysia-Thailand Growth Triangle.
25. Environmental considerations, including natural resource management, are key elements in sustainable economic growth. Growth will be short-lived if it does not conserve the natural environment and resources.  Although much of the past damage has been caused by powerful vested interests, the pressures of poverty and population compound the threat through deforestation, over-grazing, and over-fishing.  The rural poor are often forced to live on fragile lands and waters that require sensitive resource management in the face of increasing degradation.  The urban poor are exposed to disease and illness resulting from overcrowding and polluted living conditions.  Poverty reduction strategies need to be accompanied by policies and actions that enhance the quality and productivity of the environment and natural resources.
2. Social Development
26. Economic growth can effectively reduce poverty only when accompanied by a comprehensive program for social development. Just as some targeting of economic development is necessary to reach bypassed areas, so social development must be targeted.  Therefore, every country needs to have a comprehensive national poverty reduction strategy that provides for (i) adequate budgetary allocations for human capital, (ii) targeting of basic social services to the poor, (iii) removal of gender discrimination, (iv) an effective population policy, and (v) social protection. Beyond developing human capital, the aim must be to strengthen social capital, especially for people subjected to some form of exclusion.  Accordingly, targeted programs will be required in five areas.
27. Human Capital Development.  Human capital is the primary asset of the poor, and its development is of fundamental importance in the war against poverty.  Every person must have access to basic education, primary health care, and other essential services.  Without such access, the poor, and their children, will have little opportunity to improve their economic status or even to participate fully in society. It is also necessary to ensure that the relevance, quality, and quantity of education provided is designed to effectively increase participation, both in the workforce and in society at large.
28. Population Policy.  The correlation between family size and self-perpetuating poverty is generally strong, especially in rural areas.9/   Most countries see the need to reduce population growth to a rate where all children can be assured adequate investment in their future.  To do this, a major effort is needed to enhance the quality of women's lives by giving highest priority to (i) ensuring universal education for girls, (ii) providing accessible reproductive health services, and (iii) increasing economic opportunities.

9/ Population Policy Paper: Framework for Bank Assistance to the Population Sector, July 1994.
29. Social Capital Development.  Social capital defines the fabric of society and strongly influences the rate of economic progress and the manner in which its benefits are distributed. In practice, strengthening the social capital of the poor largely means increasing their opportunities for participation in the workings of society.  For historical reasons, social cohesion is often weak and many communities suffer from systematic social exclusion. In such cases, strong, proactive policies are required to reverse feelings of social and psychological inferiority, foster a sense of empowerment, and create genuinely participatory institutions.  The promotion of community-based groups to undertake microfinance, health, and natural resource management is an important first step in this direction.  Social capital, and a more inclusive society, can also be promoted through antidiscrimination legislation, land reform, security of property and tenure rights, legal recognition of user groups, and accessible justice systems.  For ethnic minorities, special education curricula and self-managed health and other services may be necessary.
30. Gender and Development.  In many societies, women suffer disproportionately from the burden of poverty and are systematically excluded from access to essential assets.  Improving the status of women thus addresses a priority area of poverty and provides important socioeconomic returns through reduced health and welfare costs and lower fertility and maternal and infant mortality rates. Giving women voice and promoting their full participation makes an important contribution to the overall development of society.  Poverty reduction programs involving microfinance (Appendix 2), water and sanitation, and environmental restoration consistently demonstrate the substantial benefits from ensuring the full participation of women (Box 1).
31. Social Protection.  Every society has people who are vulnerable because of age, illness, disability, shocks from natural disasters, economic crises, or civil conflict.  Social protection comprises a family of programs designed to assist individuals, households, and communities to better manage risks and ensure economic security. Such programs include old age pensions; unemployment and disability insurance; and social safety nets to cushion the adverse impacts of disasters, economic crises, or civil strife. Also included are policies to improve labor mobility and the enforcement of labor standards.

Box 1: Gender and Poverty

While nearly two-thirds of the world's poor are in the Asian and Pacific region, two-thirds of the region's poor are women.  And poverty is particularly acute for women living in rural areas.

In poor families, the gender division of labor, and responsibilities for household welfare, mean that the burden of poverty falls most heavily on women.  Given gender disparities in education, health care, economic participation, and incomes, women are the most vulnerable category.

The number of women living in poverty has increased disproportionately over the past decade, compared to the number of men. Male migration in search of work, and consequent changes in household structures, have placed additional burdens on women, especially those with several dependents.  In the Asian and Pacific region, the proportion of households headed by females ranges from 20 to 40 percent.

The increasing feminization of poverty is now a well-recognized trend.  It has intensified with the recent Asian crisis, where adjustment programs tend to exacerbate women's hardships, and in the economies in transition as a short-term consequence of political, economic, and social transformation.

The disproportionate numbers of women among the poor pose serious constraints to human and social development because their children are more likely to repeat cycles of poverty and disadvantage.  Improving the political, legal, cultural, economic, and social status of women is thus pivotal to escaping the poverty trap.

3. Good Governance
32. The quality of governance is critical to poverty reduction.  Good governance facilitates participatory, pro-poor policies as well as sound macroeconomic management.  It ensures the transparent use of public funds, encourages growth of the private sector, promotes effective delivery of public services, and helps to establish the rule of law.  A sound macroeconomic framework is needed to encourage efficient and productive domestic investment and to keep inflation low to protect real incomes of the poor.  Likewise, it helps prevent interest and exchange rate distortions that artificially reduce the cost of capital and discourage the use of labor.  Good public expenditure management is necessary for fiscal discipline, economic growth, and equity. The latter is achieved through an effective, progressive tax system and adequate allocations for basic education, primary health care, and other public services.  Effective regulation and supervision of the financial sector is needed to protect depositors, enhance competition, increase efficiency, and expand availability of financial resources for all members of society.  As the Asian crisis has shown, good governance is also essential to avoid, or reduce the severity of, economic crises in an era of increasing liberalization and globalization.
33. Since effective and efficient delivery of basic services by the public sector matters most to the poor, weak governance hurts them disproportionately.  Public sector inefficiency, corruption, and waste leave insufficient resources to support the requisite level and quality of public services and targeted antipoverty programs.  However, denial of basic services to the poor is not just a matter of lack of investment. Often, it is the result of (i) institutional structures that lack accountability, (ii) domination by local elites, (iii) widespread corruption, (iv) culturally determined inequality, and (v) lack of participation by the poor.  Where such problems exist, systemic changes are needed to move from poor governance to government accountable to the poor.  Such changes are difficult to bring about, since existing arrangements that exclude the poor reflect prevailing economic and power inequalities.  Yet unless these issues of inequality are tackled, it will be difficult to raise living standards of the poor.
34. Action must proceed at two levels. Public administration and expenditure management at the national level must be strengthened to promote pro-poor growth and social development.  At the same time, responsibility for provision of public services should be devolved to the lowest appropriate level of government.  Unfortunately, institutional capacity tends to be weak in local governments and there is danger of capture by local factions.  Devolution may therefore have to be pursued in a phased manner, preferably starting with priorities such as basic education and primary health care.  The long-term objective, however, should be to empower the poor and develop institutional arrangements that foster participation and accountability at the local level (Box 2).
35. In achieving this objective, as well as in poverty reduction efforts generally, a diversified range of stakeholders is involved.  Apart from the government and the private sector, civil society institutions have an important role to play.  Numerous vibrant and responsive NGOs-both national and international-are engaged in development work or championing the legal rights of the poor.  ADB will actively seek cooperation with such NGOs to benefit from their experience and perspectives, and take advantage of their closeness to the poor and vulnerable.

Box 2: Linking Governance and Poverty Reduction

Indonesia's recent financial crisis caused a multitude of problems, especially for the poor.  In responding to this emergency, ADB sought not only to help the government mitigate hardships incurred by the poor, but also to tackle some long-standing issues of governance.  The Local Government and Community Support Sector Development Program promotes important reforms in decentralization and local government.  A primary objective is the creation of a genuinely participatory system, with levels of transparency and accountability notably absent in the past.  Under new electoral laws, villages will elect councils to take responsibility for local development planning and execution, and village nominees will manage a district-level community development forum.

To maximize impact on poverty, the Program focuses on 35 districts and 6,000 villages that have been worst hit by the crisis.  Funds provided allow local community organizations to identify high priority, small-scale infrastructure projects that provide long-term community assets and create immediate employment opportunities for the poor.  In developing and managing these subprojects, local communities gain a sense of empowerment and responsibility in decision making, which will be institutionalized under the new local government regulations.  Recognizing that social transitions are complex and potentially threatening, facilitators will help villagers gain confidence in dealing with the new opportunities. The Program also specifies minimum participation rates for women in facilitation, decision-making, and employment.

 
III. THE STRATEGY
36. To ensure that all aspects of ADB operations are driven by poverty considerations, ADB must translate the framework described in the previous chapter into a comprehensive strategy.  The following sections describe how the three pillars of this framework (para.15) will underpin programs of policy reform, investment projects, and capacity building in individual countries.  In keeping with its overarching goal, the Poverty Reduction Strategy will also be the driving force for ADB's Long-Term Strategic Framework.
A. Poverty Analysis
37. Since poverty causes and characteristics differ from country to country, the starting point must be a comprehensive examination of the constraints and opportunities for poverty reduction in each country. An initial task in poverty analysis will be a review of the sector poverty targets agreed under the Strategy 21 (Appendix 1) and the Agenda for Action on Social Development (para.5) and the principal sector strategies being followed.  This will require understanding the nature, intensity, and spread of poverty; the distributional effects of macroeconomic policies; the focus and efficiency of public expenditures; and the effectiveness of government programs and institutions.  ADB will involve other stakeholders in the analysis and build on the extensive data already developed by the government and the donor community.
38. In addition to such analysis at the macro level, field studies will be undertaken to help disaggregate the poor into those in the mainstream and those excluded by geographic or social factors.  For each of these groups, the factors underlying their poverty will be identified, as will their varying needs, demands, and likely response patterns.  Assessments of the quality of governance at the grassroots level will also be required. Here, participatory assessments and consultations with civil society leaders will be used to provide a picture of the quality and accessibility of basic services, poverty reduction programs, and the legal system.
39. Through this analytical process, ADB resources will be used to support the efforts of the government to develop policies and institutions that will more rapidly reduce poverty.  In view of the growing importance of civil society and the private sector, their full involvement in this analysis is essential. ADB country teams with cross-cutting expertise will ensure that an integrated view is taken. Senior ADB staff will be directly involved in the process and will be accountable for its quality.
40. ADB recognizes that a large body of work is ongoing in the region and that many borrowing countries have well-developed strategies for poverty reduction and monitoring. In some cases, the strategies have been developed with support from other external agencies.10/  In most countries, civil society is also active and has a wealth of accumulated knowledge and understanding of poverty issues at the grassroots level. In its analysis, ADB will use this body of knowledge and proven approaches.  ADB will also support strengthening of data collection and management, poverty monitoring, participatory research, and poverty analysis.  With Pacific island members, ADB will take the lead in capacity building for poverty analysis. Insofar as its own store of knowledge is concerned, ADB is accelerating its program to build a poverty database on each of its borrowing countries.  This exercise will identify the gaps in data currently available and steps will be taken to fill these, to the extent possible, in cooperation with countries concerned and other agencies.

10/ In many countries, the World Bank and UNDP have pioneered comprehensive living standards measurement surveys and other studies.
41. Poverty reduction will also increasingly be a major focus of the work program of the ADB Institute.  In particular, the Institute will provide the analytical basis for long-term strategies for economic and social development and poverty reduction in the region.
B. Country Strategies
42. A High Level Forum to be organized and led by the Government - the key stakeholder - will be held to discuss the findings of the poverty analysis.  NGOs and community-based organizations, the private sector, ADB and other donors will also participate.  The purpose of the forum will be to discuss the causes and effects of poverty, and the activities that will have the greatest impact on poverty.  The outcome will be a common understanding of what is required to achieve poverty reduction targets.
43. ADB's Country Operational Strategy will then be formulated on the basis of the priorities emerging from the poverty analysis and the high level forum.  The Strategy will provide the analysis and set out the areas of focus, including policy reforms and sectoral emphases.  It will also take into account the comparative advantage of ADB and the programs of other agencies.11/

11/ ADB's country operational strategies are prepared every four years. Beginning 2000, all new country strategies will be prepared in the manner indicated. For borrowing countries for which operational strategies have been completed recently, appropriate adjustments will be made to reflect ADB's overarching goal of poverty reduction. To this end, detailed poverty profiles will be prepared and will guide revisions to the country strategy as well as modifications to the country assistance program.
44. A Partnership Agreement between the Government and ADB will be finalized to endorse the analysis and focus of the country operational strategy.  Based on the inputs of government, civil society and funding agencies, the agreement will formalize a sustainable partnership setting out a long-term vision and agreed targets for poverty reduction.  The agreement will also incorporate mechanisms to review performance, highlighting key indicators and institutional milestones necessary to monitor progress.12/  The Partnership Agreement will be allied to an arrangement for linking performance to the allocation of ADB resources.

12/ The targets for poverty reduction will be broken down into the specific improvements that will be needed in the corresponding poverty indicators.
45. ADB's Country Assistance Plans will translate the underlying thrusts of the partnership agreements into specific activities.  The Plans, prepared annually, identify, on a three-year rolling basis, the program of loans and assistance for each borrowing country.  Figure 1 shows how ADB's operational cycle will work.
46. ADB's Resident Missions will play a key role in the monitoring of the indicators and milestones set out in the partnership agreement. The resident missions will also be responsible for regular interaction with stakeholders and civil society organizations on progress in meeting the agreed poverty reduction targets.
C. Project Typology
47. All ADB loans and technical assistance will be expected to contribute to the reduction of poverty. Accordingly, all proposals will contain a specific assessment of their poverty impact, and the logical framework that accompanies each proposal will commence with poverty reduction as its ultimate objective. Projects or programs may (i) be designed to accelerate pro-poor growth, or (ii) focus on poverty directly.
48. Pro-Poor Growth Interventions will seek to address impediments to broad-based economic growth.  Policy-based lending will be used to correct policy and institutional weaknesses. I n the case of infrastructure investments, ADB will give priority to projects that have greater impact on poverty.  This may include locating projects in poor areas or incorporating specific components to ensure increased access for the poor to project facilities or services.
49. Poverty Interventions will be designed to disproportionately benefit the poor.  Many will be in the social sectors but some may also involve agriculture and infrastructure projects in rural areas, as well as environmental protection.  These projects will address underlying weaknesses in policy and institutions while supporting the poor through (i) education, health, or other essential services; (ii) creation of income and employment opportunities in locations or among communities where poverty is disproportionately high; and/or (iii) mitigating risks for the poor or vulnerable.  The defining characteristic of such projects is their concern for beneficiaries: the proportion of poor people among project beneficiaries will be significantly larger than their proportion in the overall population of the country, and in no case less than 20 percent.  For purposes of classifying poverty interventions, national and rural poverty lines will be set out in the Partnership Agreement.
50. Core Poverty Interventions will be a subcategory of poverty interventions specifically designed to tackle extreme poverty.  These will be tightly focused to ensure that a majority of the beneficiaries are below the poverty line.  Such projects will frequently be smaller, slower, more expensive in preparation and supervision, and involve greater risks than other projects; however, the additional effort is worthwhile, as solutions have to be found to the more intractable poverty problems.13/

13/ Typical examples of intractable poverty are communities suffering simultaneously from physical and social exclusion, e.g., low caste or ethnic minorities living in remote, resource-poor regions.
D. Program and Lending Targets
51. The partnership agreement with the borrowing country will bring together ADB's program of assistance.  It will embody lending and nonlending instruments, including policy dialogue, technical assistance, and special studies.  These constitute the program of activities ADB will undertake to help the country achieve its poverty reduction targets.  Taken collectively, the partnership agreements with individual countries will provide the total picture of ADB's program goals and lending plans.  Within this overall program, ADB's desired lending mix will include not less than 40 percent of all public sector lending for poverty interventions.  This target of 40 percent is based on the assumption that an adequate level of concessionary funds will continue to be available to ADB.
52. Until now, ADB has committed itself to ensuring that at least 50 percent of its projects and 40 percent of lending volume are devoted to projects with goals other than pure economic growth.  To monitor implementation of these targets, projects are classified according to primary and secondary goals of human development, poverty reduction, women in development, and environment.  With poverty reduction now the overarching goal, the hierarchy of ADB's development objectives has changed and the classification scheme will be revised.
53. ADB's pursuit of poverty reduction is constrained at present because some countries do not have access to concessional funds (Box 3). Efforts may be required to ease this constraint and expand lending for poverty reduction in these countries.

Box 3: Poverty Reduction in People's Republic of China and India

Almost 80 percent of the region's poor live in just two countries-the People's Republic of China (PRC) and India.  Helping to reduce Asian poverty includes tackling poverty in these two countries.  But relating the relatively small size of ADB assistance to these countries (less than one half of one percent of public investment in the case of the PRC) to the enormous scale of their poverty situations is not easy.  A further problem is their reluctance to borrow nonconcessional funds for projects yielding low financial rates of return (even though social returns may be high).

Despite these challenges, ADB's portfolio in the PRC and India does not neglect social and poverty dimensions.  In the PRC, the location of ADB-supported infrastructure projects is shifting increasingly from the coastal belt to poor counties in inland areas.  As restructuring of state-owned enterprises proceeds in the PRC, urban poverty is expected to increase.  An ADB-financed study will evaluate urban poverty in the country, help the government determine appropriate responses, and suggest ways in which ADB could assist.

In India, ADB-supported projects that address poverty or environmental objectives tend to be in the urban development subsector, including housing finance.  But the trend toward lending to state governments (e.g., Gujarat and Madhya Pradesh) may offer the greatest potential for sharpening the poverty focus of ADB's India portfolio.

Nevertheless, increasing ADB's present level of contribution to poverty reduction in the PRC and India (and in other countries borrowing nonconcessional funds from ADB) is a challenge and may call for new lending instruments (para. 89).

E. Selection of Projects
54. In selecting projects, ADB will favor those that promise the biggest return in terms of poverty reduction.  To this end, all three pillars of the strategic framework will be part of the mix of assistance offered to each country.  Figure 2 depicts the way in which the pillars will influence the overall program.
55. ADB recognizes that it is often difficult in the case of individual countries to decide how much emphasis to place on poverty interventions and how much on more growth-oriented investments. Where past performance in poverty reduction has been weak and/or inequality is rising, the emphasis will be on governance and social development.  In countries where essential reforms have been undertaken or are under way, growth-oriented investments will reduce poverty.  In choosing between projects ADB will use specific assessment techniques,14/ while giving attention to the likely impact on poverty of investments in different sectors (Box 4).  To increase understanding in this critical area, ADB will intensify its analytical work so as to more confidently offer optimum support for poverty reduction.