Home Site Map Index Contact
 
      Search :
More Options | Search Tips
Bangkok, Thailand
Last Updated: 22 March 2004

 

Space Technology Applications Section Focus Areas

RESAP

Other Activities of the Section

 


Framework for Regional Cooperation on Space Technology Supported Disaster Reduction Strategies in Asia and the Pacific

Towards regional cooperative mechanisms for managing floods and drought in Asia and the Pacific using space technology

Contents

 

VII. SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATIONS

64. To work towards harmonizing the needs of stakeholders, institutional capabilities and space systems it is first of all important to identify the potential linkages and the common threads wherein all three players could collectively be engaged. Among the various space applications, the endeavours of developing countries on risk assessment, early warning and emergency communication provide a common ground. For the benefit of countries with constrained institutional environments, especially LDCs, it is necessary to take up the initiatives discussed below.

A. Entry point activities

65. Entry point activities (EPAs), in the present context, envisage integrating the operationally demonstrated potential of space applications in areas that could attract the higher priority by user communities, and also trigger wide-ranging related the activities. Considering this, the first EPAs could involve promoting the role of Earth observation inputs in hazard zonation and risk assessment.

1. Hazard zonation and risk assessment

66. Satellite imagery has important applications in mapping, including risk assessment. While 95 per cent of the world’s land mass is mapped on the scale 1:250,000, only 33 per cent is mapped at 1:25,000. Less than 20 per cent of Asia and the Pacific are mapped at a higher scale. In the case of LDCs, the figures are far lower. In many cases, the maps available are outdated or incomplete. The development of risk assessment, driven by mapping activities, is hampered primarily by the lack of adequate data, followed by inadequate institutional and technical capacity or resources, and little policy support in developing countries.

67. Although there could be debates on the scale of mapping, format, standards and information content related to social, economic and ecological or climatic vulnerability, risk assessment ranks first in terms of users’ priorities. The use of remote sensing and GIS has also demonstrated their operational reliability in generating risk assessment scenarios to a certain level. At the micro-level, risk assessment for floods, earthquakes and landslides, some of the specific requirements – such as the digital elevation model (DEM) with close contour intervals, good SAR interferometric pairs, high-resolution imaging and the like – demand strong institutional or industry support. For drought, even the coarser levels of hazard zonation and risk assessment can serve the purpose to some extent.

68. In the simplest terms, hazard zonation and risk assessment are derivatives of other maps, such as land-cover, geological, climate and poverty maps. Land-cover maps indicate ecological vulnerability; geological maps geophysical vulnerability; climate maps climatic vulnerability; and poverty maps socio-economic vulnerability. Aggregating all these fields makes hazard zonation and risk assessment more accurate (figure VI).

Figure VI. An approach to hazard zonation and risk assessment

69. The “best practices” in the region relating to hazard zonation and risk assessment have demonstrated the operational viability of this approach. For example, multi-date satellite data capturing the flood inundations during the various flood waves could be integrated with land cover, geological, climate and poverty data (based on household census and survey data) and produce risk assessments. Based on the frequency of flooding, it is possible to identify those villages and vulnerable persons who live with maximum risks (figure VII). They could be targeted for various interventions such as insurance coverage, regulations and other policies.

Figure VII. Micro-zonation for risk assessment: Lakhimpur District, Brahmaputra Basin, India

With the above backdrop, ESCAP may consider working on the following steps:

  • Development of national-level risk information capabilities: Creating awareness, imparting training and education, facilitating information/knowledge sharing between members and associate members to encourage hazard zonation and risk assessment activities in the region. RESAP training and educational networks could be used for specialized activities.
  • Taking up regional/subregional risk assessment projects in selected pockets of LDCs: Like the “Asiacover” project, a joint initiative of FAO and ESCAP, efforts could be made to launch regional and subregional risk assessment pilot projects covering the areas most vulnerable to floods and drought. Projects could be dovetailed with other contemporary missions, including Asia Cover.
  • Diversifying the scope of mapping: In recent years, poverty mapping has attracted considerable focus. The poor in flood plains and semi-arid regions are identified as being increasingly at risk vulnerable. It is important to encourage the diversification of mapping activities to avoid duplication as well as to promote the multi-purpose uses of such maps.
  • Issuing a compendium: A compendium summarizing the “best practices” on risk assessment, highlighting operational methodologies, institutional factors and enabling applications, would be of considerable importance.

2. Strengthening early warning systems

70. Taking into account the operational role that Earth observation and satcom could play in strengthening the existing early warning systems pertaining to floods and drought, the following steps may be taken:

  • Improving hazard warning capabilities: While there are concerted efforts in developing countries to strengthen their existing capabilities, there is still a gap in understanding the scope of space applications in such endeavours. A simple review of existing capabilities reveals that most of the early warning systems for drought and floods are based on hydrometeorological parameters. There is a need to review critically the early warning systems vis-à-vis the scope for space applications to strengthen these within the existing institutional environments of developing countries. Learning from the best practices is necessary in this regard.
  • Risk assessment to strengthen early warning: Risk assessment maps provide the essential ingredients for locating the warning systems and targeting the vulnerability levels for disseminating warning messages.
  • Capacity-building at local levels: Although the early warning systems developed by international organizations, regional agencies and national governments have shown their operational reliability over the years, their weakness lie in local-level mechanisms in terms of (a) interpreting generic information into the contextual information, and (b) taking timely decisions to reduce the losses. For example, forecasters need expertise to contextualize El Niño-based seasonal drought forecast and forecasting of water-level rise in river basins. Space applications address such gaps. ESCAP, WMO and regional agencies may develop suitable enabling mechanisms to benefit developing countries.

3. Access to earth observation data and services

71. Access to Earth observation data and services is without a doubt the real entry point activity. High-resolution data are a necessity for detailed risk assessment. The emergence of “global transparency”, resulting from high-resolution commercial remote sensing satellites, promises benefits as well as costs. The challenge is to devise policies that harness the benefits of growing international transparency.

  • At the fringes of commercialization, there is a room for negotiating humanitarian causes: In the case of satcom applications, Intelsat, Ericsson and other commercial operators have demonstrated their support through United Nations agencies and enabled emergency communication networks in several vulnerable pockets. A similar framework may be useful in providing high-resolution imagery to LDCs, possibly for pilot demonstrations of risk assessment.
  • Replicating the Tampere Declaration: The Tampere Convention triggered wide-ranging satcom applications for disaster management, so a similar convention may help to expand the scope of Earth observation. A suitable framework is necessary to organize such a convention.
  • Forum of Earth observation agencies for disaster management: In the existing data distribution policies of space agencies, both in the public and private sectors, there is scope for cost-effective Earth observation data access, especially for disaster management. If a forum of Earth observation agencies for disaster management is created, in the framework of cooperation and information sharing, it will help LDCs gain cost-effective access to observation data.
  • Mobilizing the support of space agencies: Some of the space agencies, such as NOAA, have (a) rare archives of historical Earth Observation data pertaining to typical floods and drought, (b) the latest Earth observation data, information and scientific knowledge relevant to the developing countries in the region, and (c) a web site with valuable resources. The support from such agencies, especially in terms of capacity-building in developing countries to enable them to benefit from such resources, will help strengthen national capabilities in the region. For example, <www.reliefweb.int> provides valuable Earth observation inputs on natural disasters for relief operations. For the local user community, particularly in LDCs to act on such information, it is necessary to have enhanced capabilities.
  • Harnessing the benefits of Disaster Monitoring Constellation (DMC): The DMC is gaining ground in terms of providing near-real-time Earth observation access to the user community worldwide. The support of the participating agencies involved in DMC will promote Earth observation applications for emergency management. o Cultivating International Charter support to help LDCs: Although the “International Charter on Space and Major Disasters”, a partnership effort among space-faring nations, provides users the opportunity to have free access to satellite data and services, the benefits of the Charter have been limited in Asia and the Pacific region. Of around 40 activations of the Charter since 11 November 2000, support has been extended to only about eight or nine disasters from the region.

At the ESCAP level, efforts are important to maximize the benefits from the Charter. Efforts could include the following: (a) expanding the scope of the Charter to include hazard and risk assessment early warning and emergency communication (as the present focus of the Charter is primarily disaster impact assessment, it is desirable to accommodate disaster-mitigation-related services as well), (b) extending special privileges, in terms of capacity-building and other support, to LDCs, considering their higher degree of vulnerability and weaker institutional base, and (c) negotiating the role of ESCAP in helping LDCs with the overall Charter mechanisms.

4. Recasting community teleservice centres: prototype demonstrations

72. Community teleservice centres (CTCs) have served the purpose of reaching out, addressing the digital divides and empowering the community. Recasting CTCs, in the framework of community-based disaster management systems by addressing the hierarchical information needs of stakeholders, calls for multitasking of existing and planned satcom/terrestrial networks. The concept of an enhanced, deployable, disaster-response CTC with mobile communication is shown in figure VIII. Essential services, such as connectivity (telephone, fax, e-mail, video, data), dissemination of warning messages, vulnerability status, community empowerment through social safety nets, tele-medicine support, public education and training, could be organized in the multitasking mode. In fact, recasting of CTCs would address several gaps in the system, such as sending out early warning messages and other related services down the line.

  • Prototype “proof of the concept” pilot project: Considering that such initiatives can create wide-ranging impacts, it is necessary to conduct a pilot project based on multitasking the satcom/terrestrial networks. Initially, multitasking of mobile WLL-based VSATs could be considered.
  • Multitasking of broadband satellite networks: The advent of broadband satellites in Ku and Ka regions holds improved potential for wide-ranging mainstream applications. Multitasking on larger bandwidths is easier than on narrow bands and may provide better emergency services. Proof of the concept in this regard will have far-reaching implications.
  • Compendium on multitasking of satcom networks for disaster management: A compendium may serve as a valuable document for the members and associate members to develop awareness about best practices and encourage them to develop political support.

Figure VIII. Multitasking of an emergency communication network to facilitate community-based a disaster management system

 

B. Setting up regional and subregional cooperative networks for floods and drought

73. Recurrent floods and drought are common to several countries in different parts of Asia and the Pacific. The same river, for instance, may cause floods in more than one country. The real strategy for flood management, therefore, lies in taking into account the totality of the river basin, passing through different countries. Use of remote sensing and GIS enables the characterization of the entire river basin, with all the relevant spatial attributes. Similarly, a spatial perspective of agro-ecological settings that cut across several national boundaries is required for drought management. Establishing a regional cooperative mechanism to use space applications for managing floods and drought is a manageable undertaking, and the following steps are envisaged in this direction.

  • Framework of cooperative mechanisms: A “virtual” network could be made up, involving (a) international (i.e. United Nations) agencies and regional organizations such as ADPC and ADRC, (b) space agencies, including private space-based ICT service providers such as Inmarsat, Shin Satellite, Asia Satellite, and APT Satellite and (c) nodal disaster management agencies, including civil defence authorities (figure IX). The network could focus on exchanging knowledge and experience, sharing the wisdom and perspectives of managing floods and drought, particularly in the common river basins and agro-ecological zones, integrating global knowledge and technological know-how into the local context. The network, while dovetailing with national initiatives, should aim synergize the efforts of other regional or international agencies. While the network would help in integrating space applications for floods and drought, it would also aim to bring synergy among the related ongoing and planned initiatives at various levels.

Figure IX. A conceptual framework for setting up regional and subregional networks for flood and drought

  • Synergy: The network provides the opportunity to bring in synergy among the various initiatives taken up by United Nations agencies, other intergovernmental and regional organizations, as listed in annex VI.
  • Bringing disaster management and space agencies closer: The “virtual” network aims to provide an institutional interface between conventional disaster management authorities and space agencies at international, regional, subregional and national levels. In recognizing the cross-sectoral linkages of disaster management, the focus of the work is to integrate space applications appropriately.
  • Strategy: Implementing the framework is a challenging task, involving multiple agencies. However, bringing them under the umbrella of a “virtual” network involves (a) having dialogues with all the agencies, (b) working out a set of common denominator programmes and an agenda for the partnership, (c) creating a framework for synergy among organizational activities and (d) placing more focus on knowledge or expertise sharing than on financial commitments. The International Charter provides insights on organizing such partnership efforts.
  • A “road map”: Regional seminars organized by ESCAP at Beijing in 2001 and jointly with OOSA at Bangkok in 2002, focused attention on the importance of regional network (United Nations, 2003). A broad framework was also spelled out. Specialized seminars and group training sessions in Singapore and Hyderabad in 2004 on floods and agricultural drought are likely to place more focus on the overall concepts of the specialized regional or subregional networks. A detailed technical document on the framework is desirable. Subsequent steps may include (a) expert consultation and dialogue with relevant players to configure the networks and (b) consultations with members and associate members.
  • Specialized subregional network for floods: Flood management is information intensive, so sharing the information and data holds considerable significance. In the framework of a regional or subregional network, a separate sub-network for floods could be envisaged.
  • Specialized subregional network for drought: Managing drought involves intensive knowledge of agricultural systems, the ecology of arid and semi-arid regions, soil and water conservation, cropping patterns and much more. Sharing of knowledge through sub-networks will go a long way towards reducing impacts. The FAO initiative on sharing knowledge for drought management in central, eastern and southern Asia is a good example. An ARTEMIS type of network, however, may not work in the region. In the dryland tropics of Asia and the Pacific, there are irrigation systems, diverse cropping patterns and a different kind of indigenous coping mechanisms. Sharing knowledge through such frameworks seems a workable option.
  • Integration of RESAP training and education networks: Efforts could be made to integrate RESAP training and education networks to strengthen the proposed “virtual” network for floods and drought.

C. Concept promotion

1. Convergence of poverty alleviation and disaster management: a perspective

74. With the new paradigm in the overall disaster management approach, that is from relief and response to vulnerability analysis to risk management, the focus is placed on the nature of people’s vulnerability and the influence of poverty. In recent years, poverty alleviation and disaster reduction strategies have moved towards establishing stronger links with sectoral development.

75. At present, livelihood frameworks that recognize people’s vulnerability context, community-based disaster management, and risk transfer and financial mechanisms are some of the approaches recognized worldwide. Such approaches are being pursued by several agencies towards integrating poverty alleviation and disaster reduction strategies (ADPC, 2002). The use of space applications, particularly high-resolution remote sensing and GIS, for risk assessment at the community level, and connecting micro-level risk to the vulnerability of ecosystems helps enable the policy and institutional mechanisms to implement such approaches. It is therefore necessary to promote such concepts vis-à-vis the role of high-resolution remote sensing data therein.

Contents
 

Copyright (©) 2008 UNESCAP  |   Legal Notice