|
Chapter III Employment expansion
and globalization in Asia and the Pacific
A. GLOBALIZATION AND EMPLOYMENT
EXPANSION
A t the beginning of the 1990s, there was
much optimism about the impact that liberalization and globalization
would have on employment and growth in developing countries.
Financial liberalization was expected to increase the rate
of investment, enhance the efficiency of investment and
improve the savings rate, which in turn was expected to
contribute to higher investment in developing countries.
Deregulation and trade liberalization, by increasing internal
and external competition, were expected to ensure the efficiency
of such investment in terms of technology choice, scale
and operation. The positive impact this would have on growth
was expected to contribute to increases in employment.
Indeed, the dominant mood then was one of excitement about
a new phase of globalization, in which the expectation was
widespread that a significant proportion of the population
in developing countries would benefit in various ways from
new technologies and expanded trade and employment opportunities.
Women in particular were seen as major potential beneficiaries
of this trend because of the increase in feminization of
employment that was apparent, especially in export production.
Despite such optimism there was some consciousness of the
possible negative consequences; indeed, many statements
emanating from international forums contained very perceptive
analyses of the risks of inequitable growth, the chances
of marginalization and exclusion from the benefits of globalization,
the costs in terms of reduced food security and greater
environmental destruction. The key question was how the
process of globalization could be managed so as to spread
its generally beneficial effects more evenly by gender,
class and region.
This chapter is concerned with an assessment
of the progress made in expanding and improving the quality
of employment in the ESCAP region over the past three to
four decades. It is also concerned with tracking the achievement
in increasing the participation of women in the labour force
as a means to empowerment. Several aspects of the employment
scenario are touched upon: labour-force participation; employment,
unemployment and underemployment; the impact of export-oriented
production on employment and wages; and the emergence of
new forms of production organization such as working at
home and subcontracting. This chapter also contains a specific
consideration of the nature and extent of the impacts of
the South-East and East Asian 1997 financial crisis, especially
on poor women.
B. GLOBAL ECONOMIC TRENDS DURING
THE 1990S
1. The growth scenario
Liberalization and globalization had been
expected to boost economic growth, which would lead to increases
in employment through the processes noted above.
The reduction in protection and the realization
of a more appropriate market-determined exchange rate associated
with globalization were also expected to have a number of
positive effects. Wide and intensive protection in developing
countries was normally provided to the fledgling industrial
sector being fostered by the State, so that domestic industrial
prices tended to be well above international prices. However,
the agricultural sector was rarely offered protection, which
could be seen as a mechanism by which the terms of trade
were turned against the agricultural sector, thus adversely
affecting agricultural investment and peasant livelihoods.
In the event, reduced protection was seen as a means of
redressing imbalances in the terms of exchange between agriculture
and industry and stimulating growth in agriculture. Given
the larger share of the population dependent on agriculture
and the greater labour-absorbing capacity of primitive agriculture,
trade liberalization was seen as contributing to increases
in output and employment in the agricultural sector.
Furthermore, the liberalization of rules
with regard to foreign investment was expected to result
in a surge in foreign direct investment in export-oriented,
labour-intensive, greenfield projects, aimed at exploiting
the low cost of skilled and unskilled labour in developing
countries.
There was one other factor that fuelled the
optimism that stemmed from these perceptions. The conclusion
of the Uruguay Round agreement under the General Agreement
on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) had raised expectations of an
acceleration in world trade, which had already been growing
for some years. In particular, it was expected that the
agreement would stimulate exports, at higher prices, of
agricultural products and traditional manufactures from
developing countries, because of the reduction in protection
and a cut in subsidies offered to these products in developed-country
markets.
Seen from the perspective of the situation
in 2002, it is now clear that the expectations regarding
world economic growth during the 1990s were in part misplaced.
As table III.1 shows, the 10-year average rate of growth
during the periods 1983-1992 and 1993-2002 (based on projections
for 2001 and 2002) were more or less the same. Furthermore,
growth during the 1990s had been characterized by significant
variations across regions and countries, with regions and
countries displaying substantial volatility in growth rates
throughout the decade and a trend towards deceleration during
the second half of the 1990s.

The most obvious case of variation from the
global average trend is that of Japan, which registered
low rates of growth throughout the decade and experienced
a recession starting in the latter part of the decade. In
fact, the most striking feature of economic trends during
the 1990s was that the United States experienced strong
growth while most of the other economies in the world system
languished.
According to IMF estimates, the average rate
of world economic growth during the 1990s was only 3 per
cent, which is below the 3.5 per cent average of the 1980s
and the 4.5 per cent average of the 1970s. The figures for
the periods 1982-1991 and 1992-1999 stood at 2.6 and 1.9
per cent respectively in the case of the European Union
and 4.1 and 1.0 per cent in the case of Japan.
Looked at from the point of view of unemployment,
the United States economy reflected a phase of near-continuous
buoyancy with declining unemployment rates (from 7.5 to
4.0 per cent) starting in 1992. Meanwhile, Japan recorded
a continuous increase in unemployment rates from 2.1 to
4.7 per cent between 1991 and 2000.
Another set of countries adversely affected
in the latter half of the decade were the developing countries
and economies in transition that were afflicted by the 1997
financial crises, especially the East and South-East Asian
countries. Economic growth in the newly industrializing
Asian economies, which averaged 8.4 per cent annually during
the period 1983-1992, is estimated to have fallen to 4.6
per cent during the period 1993-2002, partly because of
the negative 9.2 per cent result in 1998 and the waning,
since late 2000, of the initial signs of recovery. It is
well known that the dramatic economic boom in East and South-East
Asia in the 1980s and first half of the 1990s, based on
rapid export expansion, was a major factor contributing
to whatever dynamism the world economy displayed. The extraordinary
nature of this boom does not need elaboration; nevertheless,
table III.2 shows the extent to which the East Asian subregion
(as per the World Bank classification), outperformed not
only the world economy but also that of other developing
countries in the period from 1980 to early 1997 in terms
of overall growth rates. The corollary to this is that the
downturn in the Asian and Pacific region in the late 1990s
was a major factor contributing to the disappointing performance
of the world economy over the 1990s as a whole.

The main reason economic growth for the world
and for developing countries as a whole during the 1990s
exceeded that of a decade earlier was the unusually long
economic boom in the United States during the 1990s. However,
there are signs that that boom has come to an end. Well
before the disruption and the uncertainties created by the
11 September 2001 attacks on the World Trade Center and
Pentagon buildings in the United States, there were clear
signs that world economic growth was slowing as a result
of the end of the boom in that country.
In a note on the prospects for the global
economy following the incidents of 11 September, prepared
for the International Monetary and Financial Committee in
early November, the Managing Director of IMF stated that
the staff’s revised baseline projections envisaged
that the global slowdown would be more prolonged than foreseen
in the October 2001 World Economic Outlook, with recovery
being delayed until around the middle of 2002. As a result,
global GDP growth has been revised downward by 0.2 percentage
points to 2.4 per cent for 2001 and by 1.1 percentage points
to 2.4 per cent for 2002.
Clearly, employment expansion based on growth alone is proving
inadequate in the current global context. After initial
signs that globalization would lead to a boom in world output
and trade, the evidence is accumulating that globalization
could be resulting in synchronized slow growth or recession.
2. The elasticity of employment
Employment expansion is driven not just by
growth, or the expansion of output. The capital- and import-intensity
of production affects the elasticity of employment with
respect to output or the responsiveness of employment increases
to output increases, and therefore the degree to which any
increase in output translates into an increase in employment.
A high and rising level of capital intensity reduces the
employment generated by new investment. Furthermore, a high
degree of import intensity reduces the domestic linkage
effects of any expansion of demand and therefore contributes
less to increases in domestic output and employment creation.
It is no doubt true that any given level
of elasticity of employment with respect to output implies
that employment grows to some degree when output increases.
Also, any increase or decrease in the rate of growth of
output positively or negatively affects employment generation.
These factors yield the obvious conclusion that to increase
employment it is necessary to stimulate growth as well.
However, in countries with a large reserve of unemployed
and underemployed labour, the pursuit of the goal of employment
expansion requires not just accelerating growth, but transforming
the nature of growth as well, both by encouraging the adoption
of techniques having a lower capital intensity, especially
in rural areas, and by reducing leakages of demand that
reduce the value of the multiplier. It is for this reason
that there has been much emphasis on rural development in
general and rural industrialization in particular in many
developing countries, a trend that has been encouraged by
the successful experience of town and village enterprises
in China.
Table III.3 presents calculations of the
employment intensity of aggregate manufacturing value added,
based on ILO data, for selected countries and area. It is
evident that the employment elasticities emerging from this
data set are all close to zero, and there is no clear-cut
evidence of increases in such intensity in the developing
economies or declines in the developed countries.
A different source, a UNIDO data set, provides information
that can be used to calculate employment elasticities for
a number of economies over the period 1985-1998, considered
the peak globalization phase. These employment elasticities
have been calculated for some of the economies that are
routinely described as among the more successful of the
new manufactured goods exporters and are typically seen
as the most important destinations for the jobs that are
supposedly being relocated to developing countries.
Relevant calculations by six countries and various sectors
of the available data for many of the major manufactured
goods exporters among Asian developing countries are presented
in table III.4. What is striking is how low most of the
employment elasticities appear to be. Even more striking
are the negative elasticities that emerge in some cases,
also in a range of manufacturing sectors that are typically
thought of as being labour-intensive. It is worth noting
that the elasticities range very widely across countries
and areas with otherwise similar characteristics.
The preponderance of low elasticities of employment with
respect to output points to the fact that the structure
of growth under globalization and liberalization has not
been adequately conducive to employment expansion.
3. Foreign direct investment and employment
Asia and the Pacific emerged as one of the most dynamic
regions for FDI in the 1990s, despite the first decline
of FDI flows in 13 years, in 1998, following the financial
crisis. According to the UNCTAD World Investment Directory
2000, between the late 1980s and the late 1990s, average
annual FDI flows to the region quintupled, going from just
under $16 billion to slightly more than $80 billion (table
III.5). The region’s share in world average annual
flows doubled, from 9 per cent to 18 per cent, while its
share of flows to developing countries remained more or
less stable, at 55 per cent.
In the late 1980s, the largest country in the region,
China, had average flows three quarters of the amount of
those attracted by Singapore. By the late 1990s, China’s
average flows had grown by a multiple of 13, reaching $41
billion, while Singapore’s more than doubled, to $8
billion. FDI in South Asia grew over the decade by a multiple
of 15, albeit from a very low average in the late 1980s
largely owing to the gradual opening and flow of FDI to
India (the second largest country in the region), where
the average annual flow stood at $2.7 billion in the late
1990s. During that period, South-East Asian countries other
than the NIEs caught up with the NIEs, attaining average
flows exceeding $16 billion. In the late 1980s, that average
had been just over $4 billion, as compared with approximately
$8 billion for the NIEs. The secondary sector attracted
very significant amounts of FDI flows to the region. The
tertiary sector is growing in importance, however, with
business-support services such as trade, transport, storage
and communications, and finance developing faster than any
others. In 1997, for instance, trade accounted for up to
20 per cent of FDI stock in Thailand, while finance represented
as much as 30 per cent in Pakistan. FDI continues to flow
very unevenly into individual countries in Asia and the
Pacific. More than 80 per cent of the region’s inflows
in the late 1990s went to just six economies: China; Hong
Kong, China; Indonesia; Malaysia; Singapore; and Thailand.
As for the sources of these flows, developed countries continue
to dominate flows into the NIEs, while the NIEs themselves
dominate the flows to many other countries including, pre-eminently,
China.

There had been an expectation that foreign direct investors
looking for appropriate, low-cost sites for world market
production would invest in liberalizing countries in large
measure following liberalization. As low wage costs are
one of the major benefits offered by the developing countries,
which are seen as being capital-scarce and labour-abundant,
such investment would be in the more labour-intensive sectors.
Thus, foreign investment would be virtuous in a double sense:
it would spur export production as well as increase employment.
Furthermore, it is argued that such employment expansion
would serve to redress the imbalance in the labour participation
rates between male and female workers.
Indeed, the expansion in export production that fuelled
the boom in the South-East Asian region was itself based
on the growing participation of women as wage workers. It
is currently widely appreciated that the Asian export boom
was driven by the productive contributions of Asian women:
in the form of paid labour in export-related activities
and in services, through the remittances made by migrant
women workers, and through the vast contribution of unpaid
labour by women. This phenomenon occurred as liberalization
and government fiscal contraction transferred many areas
to the public provision of goods and services to households
(and thereby to women within households).
In view of the current extreme inequality of distribution
of FDI, even allowing for a continuous increase in global
FDI flows, it is suggested that most developing countries
could do better by setting moderate, realizable targets
for the volume of FDI inflow and seeking appropriate domestic
policies to maximize the benefits they derive from those
flows. The case for moderate targets and differentiated
strategies is suggested on the basis of the experience in
Asia and the Pacific.
FDI in liberalizing developing countries is being targeted
also in the infrastructure sector, where Governments keen
on strengthening their infrastructure base offer substantial
concessions. Infrastructure industries are by definition
quite capital-intensive in nature, and the products of these
industries normally consist of non-tradable services. Here
again, even if investment is in greenfield projects, the
employment and export contributions of such investments
tend to be low or non-existent.
It is generally acknowledged that the increase in manufacturing
production, and manufactured exports in particular, is confined
to only a few developing countries. Typically, the countries
concerned have also been beneficiaries of substantial foreign
capital inflows in various forms. The countries concerned,
mostly in South-East and East Asia, have been dominant in
contributing to the increase in the share of developing
countries in total world exports of manufacture goods and
in the higher rates of economic growth.
The economies of China; Hong Kong, China; India; Indonesia;
Malaysia; Mexico; Philippines; Republic of Korea; Singapore;
Taiwan Province of China; and Thailand explain almost all
the significant increase in the manufactured exports of
developing economies over the past two decades.
The real change in the 1990s was with regard to a form
of capital flow that is widely seen as responsible for the
increased vulnerability of economies, namely, portfolio
capital movement, in the form of investment in domestic
stock and securities markets by non-residents. Such flows
registered a marked increase to developing country “emerging
markets” in the 1990s, as a result of a combination
of factors. These included the wave of financial deregulation
in the previous decade, the increasing need of international
asset managers, including growing pension funds, to diversify
their portfolios in order to ensure larger returns and the
economic slump in rich industrial countries, which reduced
rates of return on capital investments made there and forced
mobile capital to seek alternative avenues for investment.
This wave has already diminished in strength, and most
developing country equity markets have experienced the negative
effects of decelerating net inflows of foreign portfolio
capital. Currently, enthusiasm for “emerging markets”
among international portfolio managers has clearly dampened.
Such flows, however, have tended to generate unparalleled
degrees of volatility and uncertainty in capital and currency
markets. Clearly, the financial markets of some developing
countries and economies in transition, which had been seen
as the favoured destination of international investors,
are not so for the time being. The outlook for most emerging
markets is unclear, if not negative, impacting on the employment
situation.
C. THE EMPLOYMENT CONSEQUENCES
1. Employment expansion
The percentage of the total population who are economically
active (the crude activity rate) tends to increase if population
growth rates are declining, because there is a smaller proportion
of persons below employment age in the population. That
upward influence is offset by the tendency for younger persons
to delay entry into the labour force and older persons to
withdraw earlier as an economy develops and shifts to urban
formal employment. Between 1960 and 1995, the crude activity
rate (CAR) for Asia increased slightly from 47.5 per cent
to 49.8 per cent (table III.6). Almost all of the increase
in CAR is attributable to increased female labour-force
participation, which rose from 36.2 per cent to 40.6 per
cent. These trends vary greatly by subregion and country.

Employment expansion was the greatest in East and North-East
Asia for both men and women. The CAR for both sexes increased
from 51 per cent to nearly 59 per cent, and that for females
from 42 to 54 per cent. While those figures were mostly
determined by trends in China, large increases in CAR were
also attained for both sexes in Hong Kong, Japan and the
Republic of Korea.
While the CAR for males did not increase between 1960
and 1995 in South-East Asia, that for females increased
from 32 per cent to 41 per cent. Indonesia, Malaysia and
the Philippines each followed this pattern. In Singapore
and Thailand, the CAR for both males and females increased
substantially. The expansion of female employment was particularly
notable in Singapore, although it began from a low level.
Fifty-five per cent of the female population of Thailand
was economically active in 1995, a level matched only in
China. Employment was essentially stagnant in Viet Nam for
both males and females.
Total employment as a proportion of the population stagnated
throughout South, West and Central Asia between 1960 and
1995, partially because of higher population growth rates
in that subregion (note that South-Central Asia, in the
ILO definition, includes countries in South Asia, West Asia
and Central Asia). Kazakhstan and Sri Lanka are the only
exceptions to the subregional trend. In both of these countries,
employment expansion was led by female employment, albeit
from a low level in Sri Lanka.
It is clear that during this period the economies that
had been able to participate most actively in global economic
processes expanded overall employment the most significantly.
These include Hong Kong, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, the
Republic of Korea, Singapore and Thailand. While employment
expanded greatly in China between 1960 and 1995, much of
the stimulus came from internal reform as well as from the
effects of international trade and investment.
International trade stimulated female employment in East
and South-East Asia in manufactured textiles, garments,
electronic and electrical products and other household items
for export. Rapid industrial expansion also generated increased
employment in the service sector for both men and women.
Large increases in the percentage of women in the labour
force occurred in China, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Japan, Kazakhstan,
Malaysia, the Philippines, the Republic of Korea, Singapore,
Sri Lanka and Thailand.
2. Structural change in employment
During the period of rapid economic growth and of employment
expansion, the sectoral structure of labour forces in the
region also shifted significantly towards industrial and
service employment (table III.7). In Asia as a whole, the
proportion of the labour force employed in agriculture declined
from 76 per cent in 1960 to 62 per cent in 1990. During
that period, the proportion in industrial employment increased
from 10 per cent to 17 per cent and the proportion in services
from under 15 per cent to over 21 per cent. While much higher
proportions of women than of men work in agriculture, they
shifted to industrial and service employment at about the
same pace as men.
Although employment expansion was much greater in East
and South-East Asia than in South-West and Central Asia
between 1960 and 1990, the subregions underwent structural
changes in employment at about the same rate (table III.7).
In each subregion, the proportion employed in industry increased
by approximately 7 percentage points.
While the proportion of the labour force in industry increased
significantly in China between 1960 and 1990, that employed
in services increased only modestly and remains at a low
level. While the proportion of the male labour force employed
in services is essentially the same in South-East Asia and
South-West and Central Asia, a much greater proportion of
the female labour force in South-East Asia (27.6 per cent)
is employed in services than is true in South-West and Central
Asia (13.5 per cent).
In general, employment in the industrial sector increased
at about twice the rate of population growth in Asia during
the 1970s and 1980s (table III.8). This shift from agriculture
to industry contributed to higher economic productivity
and to higher average wages in the region.

The economies of Asia appear to be following the expected
cycle of industrialization, i.e., industrial employment
increases rapidly at early stages of industrialization,
then slows and may eventually decline as the economy becomes
fully industrialized and begins to shift to service employment.
Industrial employment expanded rapidly during the 1970s
in China, the Republic of Korea, several countries in South-East
Asia and Uzbekistan (table III.8). In each case, industrial
employment grew more slowly during the 1980s. Hong Kong,
China; Japan; and Singapore may be considered to have reached
a post-industrial stage, with low or negative growth in
industrial employment.
The average annual rate of increase of employment in the
industrial sector declined between 1970 and 1980 in East
Asia and in South-East Asia but increased in South, South-West
and Central Asia. During the 1980s, the rate of increase
in industrial employment in Bangladesh and Pakistan exceeded
that in any country in East or South-East Asia. The implications
for social development of shifts in labour force structure
from agriculture to industry and services will be considered
in the final section of this chapter.
3. Rural employment
Manufacturing employment trends are of importance in developing
countries because agricultural employment cannot be expected
to keep pace with the expansion of the labour force in these
countries. The arrival of the Green Revolution did not change
this expectation. There is some evidence that in the early
phases of the Green Revolution growth based on use of high-yielding
varieties, intensive application of fertilizers and pesticides
and investment in irrigation, multiple cropping and better
farming practices resulted in greater labour absorption
along with increased land productivity. However, this has
been found to be inadequate to meet the employment needed
to clear the backlog of underemployment as well as provide
livelihoods for the new entrants into the labour force.
Furthermore, in many developing countries, the lack of sufficient
public investment in irrigation, aggravated by cutbacks
in public expenditure associated with globalization, has
substantially slowed the application of new technologies
in agriculture. Even in the successful regions, where public
and private investment in irrigation has occurred, the evidence
shows that, in the later stages of Green Revolution-based
growth, the shift to more mechanized systems of production
substantially reduces the employment elasticity of output.
As a result, in many contexts, rural employment increases
have been the result of an increase in the share of non-agricultural
employment in total rural employment. This shift to non-farm
employment in rural areas occurs in three ways. First, the
shift occurs as a result of the increases in the demand
for non-agricultural products and services that an increase
in agricultural output creates, which can only be serviced
locally. Second, the expansion in non-agricultural employment
is generated by State intervention in rural development.
Third, it reflects the spillover into non-agricultural activities
of that part of the rural population that is forced to seek
employment outside the agricultural sector as a response
to the unsustainability of the process of “agricultural
involution”.
In some countries, such as India, State expenditure on
rural development has played a major role in increasing
rural non-agricultural employment. During the 1980s, along
with a rapid increase in all sorts of public subsidies and
transfers to households from the Government, there was a
very large increase in expenditure on the rural sector by
state and central governments. More generally, throughout
that period, political developments tended to give rural
interests greater power and they were able to command significant
improvement in the historically low share of government
expenditure to benefit rural areas. Nearly 60 per cent of
all new government jobs created accrued to rural areas during
the decade.
Resources were primarily allocated to expanding “rural
development” schemes with an explicit redistributive
concern. This included not only the various rural employment
and integrated rural development programmes, but also a
plethora of special schemes for a variety of identifiable
“target” groups. There was a realization that
income growth by itself would not “trickle down”
in adequate amounts to have an impact on the poor and that
targeted interventions were essential.
Furthermore, the rural elites had greater access to the
varied benefits of government expenditure owing partly to
their greater mobility and better transport infrastructure
and partly to more jobs and contracts being distributed
in the rural areas. The resulting flow of resources and
the consequent generation of rural demand led to growing
opportunities for diversification of the self-employed from
agriculture to non-agricultural enterprises.
The experience in India is, however, instructive. Many
schemes became constrained by large bureaucracies, inefficiency
and unsustainability. Moreover, the subsequent stabilization
policies resulted in a reduction in the flow of public expenditure
to rural programmes and employment and placed the livelihoods
of rural dwellers at risk.
4. Unemployment
It is well known that data on unemployment in developing
countries are extremely unreliable. Conventional surveys
aimed at capturing the employment status of those in the
working age groups do not capture their degree of access
to decent work. This is especially true of rural workers
and those earning their livelihoods from the urban informal
sector. Open unemployment is usually not an option for poor
people, who have to force themselves into some activity,
however low-paying; thus, changes in open unemployment rates
are not necessarily good indicators of changes in levels
of economic activity. This is one reason for the relatively
low and stable nature of the unemployment rates reported
by many surveys in developing countries.
Yet, in the case of the more developed of the developing
countries and areas, the evidence is clear (table III.9):
the trend is towards an increase in the rate of unemployment
over time.
Studies suggest that globalization also poses new threats
to and opportunities for employment expansion in the small
developing economies of the Pacific islands. However, the
current situation in employment is hard to gauge in a simple
way, particularly as labour statistics are often dated and
unreliable and because monetary measures are difficult to
reconcile with the semi-subsistence nature of household
economies. According to the UNDP Pacific Human Development
Report, 1999, in some countries of the subregion, such as
Kiribati, Papua New Guinea, Solomon Islands, Tuvalu and
Vanuatu, a large proportion of adults work in semi-subsistence
agriculture. In other countries, particularly Fiji, cash
employment is on a significant scale and growing. In yet
others, there is little in the way of either form of employment.
This situation, together with the availability of employment
outside the country, fuels high emigration from some countries.
Remittances from workers abroad effectively subsidize some
unemployment at home. Since Palau’s Compact with the
United States in 1994, for example, many Palauans have taken
advantage of unrestricted access to jobs in the United States.
These emigrants benefit Palau through their remittances
as well as the job skills and capital they acquire. The
negative aspects include the loss of skilled resources and
a rise in the relative proportion of unemployed and low-skilled
workers.
Agriculture, in particular export commodities, is central
to the economies of many of the Pacific islands. Other important
industries include fishing, tourism and mining (Papua New
Guinea, Fiji, New Caledonia), all of which depend on world
prices. The high degree of dependence on these sectors means
that the island economies are vulnerable to outside shocks,
in particular weather extremes. Economic downswings in growth
elsewhere, such as that caused by the 1997 financial crisis,
have had severe adverse effects on almost all the economies
of the Pacific subregion. Solomon Islands, whose economy
is heavily dependent on the export of timber and fish to
Asian countries, was particularly hard hit.
The small scale of Pacific island economies and low levels
of either foreign or domestic investment make it harder
for new entrants to the labour market to find formal employment.
High rates of population growth and school dropouts (from
grades 2 to 3) make “youth employment” a major
concern. Available data (table III.10) show that young people
are especially at risk of unemployment. In some countries,
there are up to seven times as many young people seeking
work each year as there are new jobs available. Youth unemployment
in Papua New Guinea, for example, is especially high among
young urban males with little formal education. In Samoa,
young people are three times more likely to be unemployed
as older workers. In Marshall Islands, unemployment for
urban youth runs around 50 per cent. The unemployment situation
is compounded by the entrance of more and more women into
the labour market seeking formal employment.
Economic growth in most of these countries has been highly
dependent on assistance from their former colonial administrators,
including through large and persistent aid flows and preferential
access to export markets. These arrangements are likely
to offer fewer benefits in the future, which poses a great
challenge for these countries to find alternative arrangements
and to better manage their own natural, financial and human
resources.
Another characteristic feature of the developing Pacific
island economies is the informal sector. The informal sector
includes a variety of occupations and small-scale enterprises.
These typically involve simple organizational and production
structures, require a low level of technology or skills
and a small amount of capital per worker and rely on family
labour or a few hired workers. They are informal in the
sense that they are mostly unregistered and unrecorded in
official statistics and have little if any access to organized
markets or credit institutions. Most informal sector workers
are rural, semi-subsistence producers who operate in both
the traditional exchange and cash sectors. Another smaller
group operates small enterprises or domestic services, most
of them in the cash economy and in urban areas. They include
considerable home-based activity, especially for women and
children. Yet many informal businesses operate out of urban
households, selling produce or small items. In town, small-scale
informal enterprises involve mainly the urban poor, who
typically seek multiple sources of income. Many children
are employed, particularly those who leave school early.
In both rural and urban areas, however, women are particularly
involved in the informal sector. Their small businesses
provide the main income of many urban families. Surveys
indicate that many were run by women aged over 30 years
with dependents. In Solomon Islands, almost half of all
women working for money were self-employed, and one third
of these self-employed women were the sole income earners
for their households, even though most had very little formal
education.
Prospects for economic growth vary among the developing
Pacific island economies, but all countries face a strong
challenge in generating sufficient employment. Another reason
for this is demographic, namely, the fast-growing labour
force. The other reasons are economic: the mostly small,
undiversified economies of the region, the highly structured
and rigid labour markets, the underdeveloped private and
informal sectors and socio-economic and environmental uncertainties
that discourage investment.
D. ECONOMIC PARTICIPATION OF WOMEN
1. Participation rates and related issues
Some indication of the gender dimension in economic participation
is available from table III.11. It is evident that for most
countries of the region the period between 1985 and 1997
witnessed a massive increase in the labour-force participation
of women. This process – the feminization of work
or the continuing increases in the female share of employment
– was most marked in the South-East Asian subregion,
which was also the most dynamic in terms of exporting during
that period. Throughout Asia, as a consequence, the gap
between male and female labour-force participation rates
has narrowed, suggesting that the recent period has been
one in which, at least in terms of quantitative involvement,
the gender gap has been narrowing.

Among the four countries registering declines in the labour-force
participation of women, the percentage change is small,
ranging from –1.5 in Papua New Guinea to –5.0
in India. Not too much should be made of the declines in
Fiji, the Lao People’s Democratic Republic and Nepal,
given the problems of data collection in these countries
and the well-known problems associated with the underreporting
of women’s work.
Despite the growing involvement of women in recognized
economic activity in Asia, they have continued to remain
dominant in unpaid household work, as is also shown in table
III.11. The point that growing responsibility for paid economic
activity does not necessarily reduce the burden of unpaid
work for women has been reiterated many times. However,
the sheer fact that women continue to be the dominant suppliers
of unpaid family labour is likely to be of growing significance
in view of the current reliance on adjustment policies,
which shift more economic activity onto unpaid family labour
(and thereby to women).

Table III.12 shows the shift in employment patterns in
three of the “typical” economies of the region,
where the growth of export orientation in both production
and employment meant that women wage workers came to dominate
in the export processing zones (EPZs) and even became much
more significant in non-EPZ manufacturing activities. In
this period, women workers were frequently the main contributors
to household income, rather than subsidiary workers working
for supplementary earnings, and their dominant material
contribution in the households reflected also their substantial
contribution to the aggregate national economies.
Table III.13 makes this pattern even clearer; it shows
the ratio of female employment to total employment in all
sectors of the economy taken together. As is evident, the
countries of the East Asian and South-East Asian subregions
show very high shares of female employment throughout the
1990s. (The ratios given are the average of the years for
which data were available during the period 1990-1997.)
The female share of total employment was over 30 per cent,
and reached almost 46 per cent in Thailand.

Data on four countries of South Asia are provided for comparison
in table III.13. India and Pakistan show relatively low
rates, which are even slightly lower than the average for
developing countries. However, even here, it is worth noting
that the 1990s witnessed an increase in the female share
of manufacturing employment alone. Meanwhile, the two South
Asian countries in which export-oriented production has
been or has become more important – Bangladesh and
Sri Lanka – show shares of females in total employment
which are comparable to South-East Asian countries.
2. Working conditions and wages
This trend towards the feminization of employment in Asian
countries resulted from the needs of employers to hire a
cheaper and more “flexible” source of labour
oriented to export promotion. It was also strongly associated
with the moves towards the casualization of labour, a shift
to part-time work or piece-rate contracts, and insistence
on greater freedom for hiring and firing over the economic
cycle and response to technological changes. All these aspects
of what is described as “labour-market flexibility”
became necessary once external competitiveness became the
significant goal of domestic policy makers and defined the
contours within which domestic and foreign employers in
these economies operated.
Feminization of work was also encouraged by the widespread
conviction among employers in South-East Asia that female
employees are more tractable and subservient to managerial
authority, less prone to organize into unions, more willing
to accept lower wages because of their own lower reservation
and aspiration wages, and easier to dismiss using life cycle
criteria such as marriage and childbirth.
However, when the export industries in some countries started
to experience a slowdown from the middle of 1995, it became
evident that continued growth of employment in export-oriented
industries was not sustainable; furthermore, export industries
could not serve as the same engine of expansion as they
had during the previous decade. It also became clear, therefore,
that there could be some setback in the feminization of
employment because the export industries that had become
the most important employers of women at the margin were
starting to slow. Indeed, the very features which had made
women workers more attractive to employers – the flexibility
of hiring and firing and the more casual, non-unionized
nature of their labour contracts – are precisely those
which are likely to make them the first to lose their jobs
in any recession.
It has turned out also that even the earlier assessment
of the feminization of work had been based on what was perhaps
an overoptimistic expectation of the expansion in female
employment. An ILO report has provided some trends in aggregate
manufacturing employment and female employment in this sector
during 1990 to 1997 in some of the more important East and
South-East Asian economies: Hong Kong, China; Indonesia;
Malaysia; Republic of Korea; Singapore; and Thailand.
In several of these economies – Hong Kong, the Republic
of Korea and Singapore – aggregate manufacturing employment
actually declined after 1990 as their economies matured
towards a greater reliance on the service sector.
Furthermore, while female employment in manufacturing
was important, the overall trend during the 1990s was not
necessarily upward. In fact, there was a definite tendency
towards a decline in the share of women workers in total
manufacturing employment even before the crisis. In Hong
Kong and the Republic of Korea, the decline in female employment
in manufacturing was even sharper than that in aggregate
employment; indeed, in Malaysia and the Republic of Korea,
the share of women’s employment in total manufacturing
employment declined respectively from 47 per cent to 40
per cent and from 40 per cent to 35 per cent in the five
years between 1992 and 1997.
Evidence suggests that the process of feminization of
work really peaked somewhere in the early 1990s, and that
the process subsequently was not only less marked, but may
also have begun to fade even before the effects of the 1997
financial crisis began to be felt.
This change in the feminization of work is an important
issue that clearly requires further investigation. The reversal
of the process of feminization of work has also been observed
in other parts of the developing world (notably in Latin
America), where it has been found to be associated with
either of two conditions: an overall decline in employment
opportunities because of recession or structural adjustment
measures, or a shift in the nature of the new employment
generation towards more skilled or lucrative activities.
In the East Asian case, until 1996 neither of these conditions
would have been very important, except to some extent the
second factor (a shift towards more skilled jobs) in certain
economies such as the Republic of Korea and Singapore.
It is obvious that one of the important reasons for preferring
women workers, particularly in export-related activities,
has been the lower reservation and offer wages of women.
Table III.14 presents evidence on this preference for women
labourers in selected Asian economies. It shows that women
workers’ wages have been consistently and significantly
lower than male wages in the aggregate. The differentials
are particularly sharp in the case of Malaysia, the Republic
of Korea and Singapore, where the average female wages are
just above half those paid to male workers.
To some extent, this situation reflects differences in
the types of jobs for which women are employed, which are
typically at the lower skill and lower wage end of the employment
spectrum. But the table also reflects the general tendency
towards gender discrimination in pay, whereby women are
paid less even for similar or identical jobs. This feature,
which is quite marked in East Asia, will be rendered less
significant as more and more women are drawn into employment.
As women become an established part of the paid workforce,
or dominate in certain sectors (as in textiles, ready-made
garments and consumer electronics in East Asia), it becomes
more difficult to exercise the traditional type of gender
discrimination at work. Not only is there upward pressure
on their wages, but there are also other pressures for legislation
which would improve their overall conditions of work.
While such a development is fundamentally desirable and
necessary, such action could reduce the relative attractiveness
of women workers to those employers concerned with export
profitability. A rise in wages also tends to have the same
effect. It is worth noting that the female wage as a proportion
of the male wage had been rising in most parts of East and
South-East Asia in the 1990s up to 1997. Included in the
improvement of women’s wages are Malaysia (from 49
to 57 per cent between 1990 and 1995), the Republic of Korea
(from 50 to 56 per cent between 1990 and 1997), Thailand
(from 63 to 68 per cent between 1991 and 1995) and Singapore
(from 54 to 60 per cent between 1990 and 1997). Hong Kong
was the only economy in the region for which there was a
decline in this ratio, from 69 to 61 per cent between 1990
and 1997.
During this period (the 1990s), there were legislative
and other moves towards protecting the interests of women
workers in such areas as maternity benefits and the nature
of their contracts. For example, in the Republic of Korea,
a law which allowed women to be fired once they got married
was repealed in the early 1990s.
If these improvements explain the tendency towards the
reduced employment of women, then it raises certain crucial
questions, which will become increasingly important in the
near future. How can societies ensure the minimum provision
of basic rights and privileges to women workers and improve
their working conditions without simultaneously eroding
their advantages to employers and reducing the extent of
female wage employment? How can such rights and basic labour
standards be ensured in the coming phase, in which heightened
export competition is likely to be combined with a phase
of aggregate employment contraction, as the full force of
the current adjustment measures is felt in the real economies?
These questions are already pressing concerns, as is evident
from the growth of unemployment in the region, which is
bound to accelerate in the coming period. During the 1990s,
female open unemployment rates were much higher than those
of men even in the expansionary phase, as table III.15 makes
clear. However, as the exporting industries shrink and as
the general economic decline is worsened by adjustment measures
that could adversely affect workers (men as well as women),
the problem is likely to become more acute.

Evidence suggests that more workers (women as well as men)
will lose their paid employment and be forced to consider
occupations which are even more precarious and offer inferior
conditions as unemployment worsens in the current uncertain
economic climate. Thus, even the progress that was achieved
in the early part of the decade, in terms of better pay
and conditions for women workers, may be reversed. All these
factors underline the need to focus on patterns of employment
generation which are not prone to sudden “boom-and-bust”
cycles, but are sustainable over the medium term. Only then
can even the basic conditions of work for both women and
men be ensured.
3. Home-based work
The economic participation by women as home-based producers
has increased in significance. The actual contribution of
women, even in this area, involving subcontracting relations,
is very large. Thus, in India, it has been shown that most
of the apparently self-employed women in manufacturing activities
are actually involved in home-based, piecework as contractor-mediated
employees of informal or partly formal capitalist businesses
(Bardhan 1987; Shah and Gandhi 1992; Hirway and Unni 1995).
In Pakistan, while employment of women in the formal sector
is still very small, recent trends show a rapid increase,
and unrecorded indirect involvement through subcontracting
and ancillary informal sector activities is also estimated
to be very large. In Bangladesh, exporting industries in
the garments, leather and electronic assembly industries
have increasingly relied on the formal employment of young
female labour, but there is now evidence to indicate that
a substantial part of the work in the garments and leather
goods finishing industries in particular is subcontracted
to home-based women workers on a piece-rate basis. In Sri
Lanka, home-based production is supposed to account for
fully half of all current employment, while even in the
Republic of Korea the ratio is said to be as high as 33
per cent (UNDP 1999a).
Obviously, the issue of home-based work by women is a
complex one. On the one hand, such work may be preferred
by both employers and employees alike. Women workers may
desire such work because it enables them to add income-generating
activities to household work without physically leaving
their home, which means that other household duties can
be performed simultaneously. It also provides greater flexibility
in the use of time, including that for commuting. However,
such work also lends itself to the greatest possibilities
of exploitation, since the individual woman working at home
has virtually no bargaining power and the scope for worker
protection is extremely limited. It has generally been found
(Shah and Gandhi 1992) that home-based production by women,
through a “putting-out” system in which such
production is the base of a complex production chain ultimately
involving major multinational producers, produces the lowest
level of remuneration, few or no benefits or social protection.
The current policy response to this dilemma has been in
terms of proposing a convention for home-based workers,
along the lines of similar ILO conventions. As aggregate
household real incomes decrease and as real wages or employment
get squeezed by adjustment and recession in various Asian
countries, such production may actually increase and form
part of the survival strategies of households faced with
adverse material circumstances. The combination of crisis
and adjustment measures in the region is likely to increase
the reliance of employers (both large and small) on such
home-based work and subcontracting arrangements.
4. Child labour
Low wage labour often leads to the issue of paid and unpaid
child labour, especially that of girl children. It has been
estimated that the largest child-labour population in the
world is to be found in Asia: 120 million children between
the ages of 5 and 14 who are fully employed and more than
twice that many, an estimated 250 million, for whom work
is at least a secondary activity (Ashagrie 1998). The majority
of child labourers in South and South-East Asia are to be
found in home-based, agricultural or informal sector and
service activities, although there are some cases of children
being employed in manufacturing as well. This situation
reflects the fact that the rapid economic growth in some
sectors and regions – along with widespread poverty
of the labour supply households – has resulted in
children being drawn into commercial and industrial activities.
Child labour, though not prevalent in the developing Pacific
island economies, is a growing concern (ILO 2001b). In urban
areas, increasing numbers of children who are not enrolled
in school or have left school early are found on the streets.
Information collected by several sources, including civil
society and the news media, suggests that this problem is
on the rise. In Fiji, despite a national policy that provides
free education up to the age of 10, children are often found
begging on the street or working as shoeshiners, wheelbarrow
handlers, bottle collectors, etc. Anecdotal evidence indicates
that many are from homes which cannot support them because
their parents are unable to generate enough income to meet
school fees. There are reports that some children are found
to be working in industrial enterprises. Also, in some countries,
newspaper reporters indicate that some Pacific island children
are involved in prostitution.
Karunan (1998) noted that girls are being disproportionately
employed for work in urban and rural areas in comparison
with boys, and there is a significant correlation of this
trend with the relative school dropout rates for boys and
girls. Certainly in home-based work, there tends to be a
heavy emphasis on the unpaid labour of the girl child, including
not only such activities as childcare and housework, but
also piecework in home-based arrangements. The drastic reduction
in spending on social welfare and safety nets and reduced
government budgets for essential services for the poor in
countries affected by the economic crisis and structural
adjustment programmes are likely to contribute directly
to the growing incidence of child labour, both by increasing
poverty in wage-based households and reducing the availability
of public services. The issue of female child labour may
thus become one of growing significance.
5. Unpaid labour
Unpaid labour forms a very significant part of the time
spent on economic activities by women. Time-allocation studies
commissioned by UNDP found that, in the 11 developing countries
studied (including the following Asian countries: Bangladesh,
Indonesia, Nepal, Philippines and Republic of Korea), women
worked, on average for longer hours than men (by 13 per
cent) and spent two thirds of their time on unpaid activities,
whereas men spent less than a quarter of their time on such
activities. A study in Bangladesh has found that this disparity
worsened, and female total labour time increased, with the
combination of increased female export-based employment
and structural adjustment measures.
It appears that, just as the Asian economic boom was based
largely on the paid labour of women workers, the pattern
of adjustment to the crisis and associated slump in economic
activity and employment may rely heavily on the unpaid labour
of women. Adjustment packages tend to intensify the workload
of women by increasing their participation in formal and
informal labour markets. Women often assume the responsibility
for “making ends meet” when household real incomes
fall and therefore become the category of workers that dominates
in the adjustment because of the decline in their effective
received wages.
Box III.1. The Maharashtra
Employment Guarantee Scheme
The Maharashtra Employment Guarantee
Scheme (EGS) has attracted particular attention for
its scale (providing some 148 million person-days
of work to some 500,000 people in 1993), longevity
(27 years) and rights-based approach to social protection
(since being placed on a statutory basis in 1977,
EGS has provided a legally-based guarantee of employment
to anyone aged over 18 who applies). As such, it provides
an interesting model for other Governments seeking
a sustainable public works-based approach to social
protection.
It is important to see EGS as one part
of a package of social protection and poverty reduction
instruments. While it has not brought many of the
poor over the poverty line, it has reduced the depth
of poverty, raising and stabilizing the incomes of
households whose income falls below that line. Women
have benefited, as have low-caste groups. It also
appears relatively cost-efficient: as with most public
works programmes, the wage rate is set low so that
the scheme is self-targeting, attractive only to those
without other opportunities. This seems to work, with
only 10 per cent of beneficiaries classified as non-poor.
However, as an employment-based scheme, EGS is not
able to provide social protection to some groups among
the poor. Other measures are needed to reach the elderly,
the ill, the disabled and, an occasional peculiarity
of Indian society, the high-caste poor, who are socially
or culturally constrained in their ability to make
use of EGS employment opportunities.
Second-order effects are complex but
seem to have had a net positive impact. The guarantee
of EGS wages has exerted upward pressure on agricultural
wage rates, although the size of this effect varies
considerably between localities. The assets created
by EGS seem to benefit both rich and poor (although
the sustainability of the infrastructure is an issue,
as in many public works schemes). The construction
of rural roads improve the poor’s access to
markets and services, while “drought-proofing”
irrigation and soil conservation measures benefit
land-owning farmers directly but also (through second-order
impacts on demand for labour and agricultural wage
rates) indirectly benefit the landless poor. One obvious
question concerns how Maharashtra managed to build
a political consensus in support of the scheme, when
urban groups pay for half the costs of this rural
programme. The rural rich feel that they benefit from
the public assets created; it is argued that the urban
rich and middle classes see expenditure on EGS as
a reasonable price to pay for containing rural-urban
migration and the urban overcrowding that results.
Once institutionalized, the scheme has become part
of the political landscape: representatives of all
political parties and bureaucrats all wish to be associated
with the impact of EGS in their constituencies.
__________________
Source: World Bank, “Localizing ideas for poverty
reduction: addressing vulnerability and providing
social protection”, November 2001 (http://www.vdic.org.vn/eng/pdf/vulne-cuoi.pdf,
12 March 2002).
|
By now, it has become well known that market-oriented structural
adjustment programmes tend to lead to an increase in unpaid
labour by women. This phenomenon has been discussed extensively
(UNDP 1995). It has been argued that the basic inadequacy
of structural adjustment programmes from the women’s
perspective is that they emphasize price changes and market
forces as the preferred instruments of resource allocation,
but fail to consider explicitly the process of reallocation.
Thus, they implicitly shift the burden of adjustment to
the unpaid segment of the economy in the household sector
and ignore the fact that it is largely women who will have
to supply that unpaid labour.
E. POLICY IMPLICATIONS
Overall, the process of globalization poses important
challenges to the potentials for employment generation in
Asia and the Pacific. Moreover, the current global economic
slowdown, which may be more prolonged than originally foreseen,
does not bode well for employment expansion based on growth
alone. There is a need for specific policies to counteract
the tendency towards jobless growth and deal with the increasing
level of informal, casual and volatile work.
Poor or slow growth will also cause severe employment
problems for the most vulnerable groups of workers, among
them young workers, women, migrant workers, the long-term
unemployed and persons with disabilities. Their situation
is often compounded by labour-market segmentation, which
is common in all developing countries. Formal sector workers
have difficulty moving from one labour-market segment to
another because of barriers such as distance from alternative
markets, entry requirements, education and skills requirements
and non-job related aspects like discrimination based on
status or ethnic group. It is easier for workers to move
from the formal to the informal sector or from wage employment
to self-employment because neither the informal sector nor
self-employment has significant entry barriers.
1. Nature of employment
The trends in employment expansion and structural change
generally conform to the concept of a shifting comparative
advantage among economies. At a low level of development,
a country with abundant labour may offer relatively low
wages, and its comparative advantage would lie in labour-intensive
basic industry. At higher economic and social development
levels, educational levels and wages rise and the economy’s
comparative advantage shifts to more value added manufacturing
based on higher levels of technology. As the economy continues
to develop, its comparative advantage may shift to the tertiary
sector and knowledge-based enterprises, such as business
and financial services, research and development, and information
and communications.
2. Human capacity-building
The rapid changes in job-market requirements and needed
skills increase the emphasis on training and lifelong learning
to raise workers’ employability and improve access
to employment. Countries need to continually invest in skills
and knowledge development and the training of their workforce
in the light of these changes, including advances in technology
and work organization. The risks are higher for the vulnerable
groups and reduce their opportunities and incentives for
training. To progress to higher levels of value added employment
(and thus towards higher incomes at the individual and aggregate
levels), the population and workforce must steadily improve
their knowledge and skills to contribute effectively to
changing job market requirements. Human resources development
or human capital formation is essential for sustaining a
productive workforce. Importantly, as policy attends to
the development of both human and social capital, there
are two elements that deserve special attention: making
new information technologies available to wider segments
of the population and building productive assets, especially
for poor men and women at the household level.
Because the structure and composition of labour markets
are changing rapidly, there are also pressures to heighten
“flexibility” and this can mean compromising
on the protection of workers’ incomes, rights and
working conditions. Evidence suggests that making labour
markets flexible by abandoning protection for workers does
not help in dealing with changing labour markets and capturing
global opportunities in trade and investment. Instead, the
new vulnerabilities in labour markets call for the following:
(a) Employment expansion, especially on reasonably productive
jobs;
(b) Regular upgrading of workers’ skills, through
training, dissemination of technical know-how and developing
the technical skills needed to overcome the labour-market
segmentation that is characteristic of developing countries;
(c) Having in place reasonable compensation, minimum wage
and accepted labour standards and rights;
(d) Increasing the productivity of the informal sector through
tax holidays, duty exemptions, lower interest rates and
access to credit.
In addition to training, labour-market interventions are
necessary to attend to a wide-ranging set of issues, including
employment promotion and poverty alleviation, human resources
development, migration policies, industrial relations policies,
labour standards, workers’ protection, labour administration
and statistics.
In designing such interventions, the distinction between
the private and public sectors is relevant, particularly
in transition economies. In Central Asian countries, most
labour policies are geared or should be geared towards private
sector development in an attempt to reduce employment in
State-owned enterprises from the quasi-totality of employment
as it had been in 1989. An important issue is the absorption
of excess labour from agriculture. In the Central Asian
economies, labour-market policies face a much more important
task in trying to facilitate enterprise restructuring. The
growth prospects of these countries are almost entirely
dependent on enterprise restructuring.
3. Country-specific conditions
Labour policies need to consider differences between the
rural and urban areas. For instance, for improved efficiency
and effectiveness, labour-market exchange systems set up
in rural areas might take account of the limited infrastructure
and transport system, seasonal labour and the strength of
village organizations or community services vis-à-vis
formal local authorities.
In urban areas, the focus may be put on youth and female
unemployment. This is so because in rural areas young people
and women in need of a job can be occupied with various
types of agricultural or household duties, thus appearing
in statistics as employed or economically inactive rather
than unemployed. Intrahousehold income distribution is also
typically different in urban and rural areas. Offering training
or public works to households in urban or rural areas can
have very different repercussions on household income.
Attention should be given to measures to protect and support
informal sector workers with skills training, credit and
marketing programmes to secure their livelihoods. This is
particularly important, for example, for female workers,
those with low skills and a majority of the Pacific island
workers for whom formal sector employment is not a viable
option. Research has pointed to the many livelihood opportunities
that a more active informal sector can create (UNDP 1999b).
Promotion of informal sector work expands livelihood opportunities
to all sectors of the community, especially those disadvantaged
by their lack of formal education. Increasing the demand
for surplus labour generally raises the income of the poorest
groups in a society.
In view of the narrow range of economic resources in the
developing Pacific island economies, a firm basis for growth
is to promote sustainable resource use and increase the
local value of local resources. Productivity and employment
need to be expanded in such a way that natural resources
are not used indiscriminately. A clearer environment policy
could encourage investment and trade and ensure that more
of the benefits of such are realized locally. The Pacific
subregion is, for example, the most important tuna-fishing
area in the world, providing about one third of the global
catch. The sustainability of this resource and expanding
it by good management are critical to the employment prospects
it offers. Around 10,000 Pacific islanders depend on tuna
fishing and processing for their livelihoods and possibly
another 20,000 are indirectly employed by the industry,
but the industry could provide a livelihood for many more
people in the region. Pacific islanders comprise less than
10 per cent of the crews of commercial fishing boats in
the region. Local recruitment could be increased by better
regional coordination of qualified crew, regional standardization
of contracts, more local training opportunities and more
information reaching local employment agencies about recruitment
opportunities and procedures in the United States and Asian
fleets. Much more local employment and local business could
be generated by bringing the foreign tuna-fishing fleet
onshore. Such a move onshore would be particularly suited
to decentralizing employment, creating jobs for women and
developing private enterprises, including in the informal
sector.
4. Gender-related dimensions
A central challenge is how to encourage female participation
and promote equal gender opportunities at work without disrupting
cultural values, family life and social stability. Developing
appropriate support systems for child reproduction and child
care becomes necessary for working mothers. By contrast,
in economies that are mostly rural, labour policies per
se may not be the best means to improve equal gender opportunities
in the labour market. In some cases, improving water and
sanitation infrastructures can do more to benefit women
than a kindergarten, by reducing the time needed to collect
water where this is a traditional female task.
Other than the human rights aspect of gender equality,
there is also a valid economic argument. Bringing women
into full employment at an equal wage with men encourages
women to work, increases the potential for the growth of
any economy and enables the best use of local labour as
opposed to immigrant labour. A number of countries have
made great efforts to encourage women to work, so as to
keep the internal labour supply up to demand requirements
and avoid massive immigration.
5. Labour migrants
For some countries, policies regarding migrant workers
need urgent attention. The economies that have expanded
employment rapidly have also generally reduced population
growth, so that labour shortages are apparent in some sectors.
Large wage differentials between countries of the region
have induced large movements of international labour migration
within the region. Millions of persons in the region now
work in countries other than their own. International labour
migration can benefit the migrants, the country of origin
(through remittances and removing some surplus labour) and
the country of destination (by solving labour shortages).
However, the possibility for the workers to be exploited
can occur at each of the steps involved in recruitment,
movement, employment and return, and workers outside their
own country may be particularly vulnerable to infringement
of their rights. Much greater subregional and regional cooperation
is required to smooth the process of international labour
migration and ensure the rights and benefits to which the
workers are entitled. To assist the migration of unskilled
workers, labour-sending countries could set up employment
units in receiving countries to capture employment opportunities
and protect workers’ well-being. Countries also need
stronger legal frameworks and laws to stop human trafficking.
NGOs and other civil society institutions could play an
important partnership role in eliminating human trafficking.
6. Labour-market policies
Labour policies are more likely to be seen and accepted
by Governments as an effective way to facilitate matching
the supply of and demand for labour, especially in highly
segmented labour markets. They provide some form of assistance
to the unemployed as a form of social protection. Job brokerage
and training could contribute to matching the unemployed
with vacancies, while microfinance and other measures aimed
at assisting the self-employed could be effective in creating
new jobs. In some labour-surplus countries where large numbers
of people live in poverty, food-for-work programmes could
provide employment, improve the nutritional status of the
population and contribute to building the infrastructure.
However, the overall effect of such measures on the economy
is usually marginal. Therefore, it is important to have
the correct expectations of labour policies and invest in
monitoring and evaluation, especially for new experimental
measures, in order to keep the possible waste of resources
to the minimum. The establishment of costly systems such
as employment service networks should be carefully reviewed
before their introduction.
Finally, different labour policies or groups of labour-related
policies may also be managed by different institutional
arrangements. A country’s ministry of labour may be
the principal organization responsible, but it is by no
means the only unit of government to play an important role.
Ministries of industry, the economy, education, finance
and the interior, among others, are often involved in one
way or another in the design or implementation of labour
policies. Trade unions, employers’ organizations,
NGOs, local administrations and village autonomous organizations
are just some of the stakeholders which may be involved
in the design and implementation of labour policies. A country
strategy needs very much a “who-does-what?”
preliminary assessment in order to ensure that issues relating
to implementation and division of responsibility are addressed
from the start.
|