ESCAP logo
Back

REGIONAL COORDINATION MECHANISM
THEMATIC WORKING GROUP ON DISABILITY-RELATED CONCERNS

TWGDC9/MINUTES
7 January 2005
ENGLISH ONLY

UNITED NATIONS
REGIONAL COORDINATION MECHANISM
THEMATIC WORKING GROUP ON DISABILITY-RELATED CONCERNS

Ninth Session
1-2 December 2004
United Nations Conference Centre
Bangkok

MINUTES

    1. OPENING OF THE MEETING
    2. ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA
    3. CONFIRMATION OF THE MINUTES OF THE EIGHTH SESSION OF THE THEMATIC WORKING GROUP ON DISABILITY-RELATED CONCERNS (TWG-DC), HELD 15-16 JUNE 2004
    4. TASK FORCE ACTION REPORTS
    5. EVALUTION OF ACHIVEMENTS AND SHORTCOMINGS OF UNESCAP ACTITIVIES BY MEMBERS OF THE TWG-DC AND THE PROPOSED UNESCAP FUTURE WORK TOWARDS THE MID-POINT REVIEW (2007) OF THE ASIAN AND PACIFIC DECADE OF DISABLED PERSONS(2003-2012)
    6. REPORT ON THE UNESCAP/ APDF WORKSHOP ON REGIONAL FOLLOW-UP TO THE THIRD AND FOURTH SESSIONS OF THE AD HOC COMMITTEE ON A COMPREHENSIVE AND INTEGRAL INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION ON THE PROTECTION AND PROMOTION OF THE RIGHTS AND DIGNITY OF PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES (UNCC, BANGKOK, 11-12 OCTOBER 2004)
    7.  MATTERS CONCERNING THE PLANNED APDF GENERAL ASSEMBLY IN 2005 AND THE 11TH SESSION OF THE TWG-DC
    8. REPORT ON THE PLANNED ACTIVITIES IN OBSERVANCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL DAY OF DISABLED PERSONS, TO BE HELD ON 3 DECEMBER 2004, UNCC, BANGKOK
    9. REPORTS OF FUTURE ACTIVITIES (ILO, CBM/ICEVI)
    10.  OTHER MATTERS

ANNEXES

ANNEX I: LIST OF THE PARTICIPANTS
ANNEX II: DRFT MINUTES OF THE TASK FORCES HELD AT THE NINTH SESSION OF THE THEMATIC WORKING GROUP ON DISABILITY-RELATED CONCERNS(TWG-DC)
Annex II (a): Employment and Poverty AlleviationS(TWG-DC)
Annex II (b): Education for All Children and Youth with Disabilities (EFA)
Annex II (c): Information and Communications Technology (ICT)
Annex II (d): Women with Disabilities (WWD)
Annex II (e): Self-help Organizations (SHOs)
Annex II (f): Post Conflict Countries
Annex II (g): Proposed International Convention on Persons with Disabilities


I. OPENING OF THE MEETING

Ms Thelma Kay, Chief, Emerging Social issues Division (ESID) of the United Nations Economic and Social Commission (UNESCAP), opened the Ninth Session of the Thematic Working Group on Disability-related Concerns (TWG-DC) with a welcome statement.

Ms Thelma Kay said that a significant part of UNESCAP work in 2004 was focused on three categories: (1) monitoring of the implementation of the Biwako Millennium Framework for Action towards an Inclusive, Barrier-free and Rights-based Society for Persons with Disabilities in Asia and the Pacific (BMF); (2) regional input to the process towards the elaboration of an International Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Rights and Dignity of Persons with Disabilities, and (3) regional and inter-regional cooperation and networking.

Ms Kay stated that the Regional Workshop on Regional Follow-up to the Third and Fourth Sessions of the Ad Hoc Committee on a Comprehensive and Integral International Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Rights and Dignity of Persons with Disabilities, held from 10 to 11 October 2004, was co-organized with the newly establish NGO forum, the Asia Pacific Disability Forum (APDF), and that the convening proved to be a timely example of regional and sub-regional cooperation among various stakeholders, including international non -governmental organizations(INGOs), non-governmental organizations (NGOs), grassroots self-help groups, Governments and others.
Furthermore, Ms Kay briefed about the Field Study cum Regional Workshop on Poverty Alleviation among Persons with Disabilities, held from 25 to 29 October 2004, which was also co-organized by UNESCAP and the China Disabled Persons Federation (CDPF).

Ms Kay pointed out that we were now at the end of the first two years of the Decade, entering the new stage to formulate our own strategies towards the mid-point review and revision of the BMF, to be held in 2007.
Ms Kay concluded her speech by reaffirming our continued commitments for the rest of the Decade and extending her gratitude towards the participants of the TWG-DC.

The Ninth Session of the TWG-DC was by chaired by the appointed chairperson, Mr Graham Smith of Disability Australia, on behalf of the APDF. It was attended by some 30 participants. The list of participants is attached as Annex I.

II. ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA

The TWG-DC adopted the following agenda.

A. Meetings of Task Forces:

  1. Employment and Poverty Alleviation
  2. Education of All Children and Youth with Disabilities (EFA)
  3. Information and Communication Technology (ICT)
  4. Women with Disabilities
  5. Self-help Organizations of Persons with Disabilities (SHOs)
  6. Post Conflict Countries
  7. Proposed International Convention on Persons with Disabilities

B. Plenary session:

  1. Ninth session of the Thematic Working Group on Disability-related Concerns (TWG-DC), plenary session
  2. Adoption of the Agenda
  3. Confirmation of Minutes of the Eighth Session of the TWG-DC, held 15-16 June 2004
  4. Task Force action reports
  5. Evaluation of achievements and shortcomings of UNESCAP activities by members of the TWG-DC and the proposed UNESCAP future work towards the mid-point review (2007) of the Asian and Pacific Decade of Disabled Persons (2003-2012)
  6. Reports on the UNESCAP/ APDF Workshop on Regional Follow-up to the Third and Fourth Sessions of the Ad Hoc Committee on a Comprehensive and Integral International Convention on Protection and Promotion of the Rights and Dignity of Persons with Disabilities (11-12 October 2004, UNCC, Bangkok)
  7. Matters concerning the planned APDF General Assembly in 2005 and the 11th Session of the TWG-DC
  8. Reports on the planned activities in observance of the International Day of Disabled Persons, to be held on 3 December 2004, UNCC, Bangkok
  9. Reports of future activities (ILO, CBM/ICEVI)
  10. Other matters

III. CONFIRMATION OF THE MINUTES OF THE EIGHTH SESSION OF THE TWG-DC

The minutes of the Eighth Session of the TWG-DC, held in Bangkok, from 15 to 16 June 2004, were adopted.

IV. TASK FORCE ACTION REPORTS

Brief reports were presented from the seven Task Forces listed in the agenda. Full Task Force minutes are presented in the Annex II.


a. Employment and Poverty Alleviation

The Task Force informed that Fiji and Sri Lanka were both in the process of ratifying the ILO Convention 159. When and if both countries ratify it, a total of eleven countries out of 46 signatory states would have ratified the Convention 159 in the UNESCAP region. This would add up to approximately 24% of the signatory states.

The Task Force confirmed that it would organize a two-day workshop in June or July 2005, in conjunction with the 10th Session of the TWG-DC. UNESCAP will be the Secretariat for the first day of the workshop, and the ILO will be the Secretariat for the second day. Thematic focus of the first day will be “poverty alleviation and Community-Based Rehabilitation (CBR),” and that of the second day will be “a roundtable dialogue among multinationals and stakeholders on hiring and training of persons with disabilities. This workshop will be held prior to the 10th Session of the TWG-DC. The exact dates of the workshop and the 10th Session will be decided soon, but probably be either during the last week of June or the first week of July 2005.

The part I of the workshop will be considered to be the second phase of the UNESCAP/CDPF Field Study cum Regional Workshop on Poverty Alleviation among Persons with Disabilities, held from 25 to 29 October 2004. Thus the agenda of the part I will be derived from the outcome document of the Workshop in October 2004, “Joint Statement on Poverty Alleviation Among Persons with Disabilities,” with an emphasis on the critical role of partnerships among the public and private sectors and civil society, and Community-Based Rehabilitation (CBR) as a key for effective poverty alleviation strategies.

The part II of the workshop is provisionally entitled, “Multinational Corporation Roundtable on Hiring Persons with Disabilities,” and is expected to be attended by a dozen of multinational corporations from various industries such as automobile industry (Honda Co. Ltd.), hotel service industry (Marriot Hotel), computer and information industry (IBM, Microsoft) and others. A set of criteria for invited corporations will be developed and sent online by Ms Debra Petty of the ILO to the members of the preparatory committee of this roundtable. The criteria will include the following: 1) Whether a corporation has an operation in the Asian and Pacific region (preferably a regional or branch office located in Bangkok, Thailand); 2) Whether a corporation has a good record of employing persons with disabilities; 3)Whether a corporation has willingness for promoting hiring and training of persons with disabilities in the future.

A suggestion was made from Mr Bill Brohier to invite the Malaysian Airline because it has a good record of hiring blind people. The preparatory committee on this workshop was already formed and the members were assigned to make initial contacts with the multinational corporations of their responsibility.

Invited Governments were selected based on interests of multinational corporations in the country. The countries included so far are Bangladesh, Cambodia, China (including Hong Kong), Fiji, India, the Philippines, and Viet Nam. Other countries may be added at a later stage.

b. Education for All Children and Yourh with Disabilities(EFA)

The Task Force first extended its gratitude towards the UNESCAP Secretariat for accommodating the need of the Task Force for a three-hour meeting.

The Task Force informed that Ms Penny Price was elected as the Chair of the Rehabilitation International (RI) Education Commission and that Ms Nareewan Chintakanond was elected as the Regional Chair of RI Asia-Pacific. Due to this new position, the regional office of RI now is located in Thailand.

UNESCO has hosted two meetings with the theme of Inclusive education in October 2004: The Regional Workshop on Inclusive Education and the 6th EFA National Coordinators Meeting. Several Members of TF EFA attended and made presentations. Very strong and close collaborations between TF EFA and UNESCO have become one of the most significant achievements of the TF EFA. However, the Second Steering Committee of the Flagship on the Right to Education for Persons with Disabilities: Towards Inclusion, scheduled to be held in Bangkok in October 2004 was cancelled due to lack of funds but a mini-meeting was held with those members of the Secretariat who were in Bangkok to attend the UNESCO meetings.

Also, the Task Force reported on the current situation of the Regional Asian and Pacific Working Group of the Flagship. According to the report, the Terms of Reference (TOR) for the Working Group were accepted by the Flagship Secretariat in November 2003. UNESCO Bangkok, however, declined to accept the coordination role as the Secretariat as specified in the original TOR. An alternative coordination mechanism is currently being worked out with the possibility that responsibility for coordination will be shared by a number of agencies, which may include RI Asia and Pacific, CBM, UNESCAP and UNESCO Bangkok.

The Task Force proposed a recommendation for TWG-DC plenary approval on the amalgamation of the TF EFA and the Working Group. UNESCAP said that it would provide limited logistical supports including the provision of meeting rooms and possibly, coffee break.

c. Information and Communications Technology (ICT)

Ms Lasapan Toomsawasdi of the APCD, reported on behalf of Mr Monthian Buntan, Chairperson of the Task Force. First, she reported on activities undertaken by the Chairperson.


One of the recent major activities was a meeting with Mr Bill Gates, Chairman of Microsoft (MS), as a part of a summit, “Libraries for the Blind and Print Disabled: Moving Toward a Digital Future,” held from 8 to 10 November 2004 at the Microsoft headquarter in Richmond, Washington U.S.A. Mr Buntan joined the meeting with Mr Gates along with representatives from libraries for the blind and print disabled around the world to initiate planning on establishing universal information accessibility through a global digital library. Representatives from more than twenty countries, agencies working in developing countries, the international publishing community, The W3C Web Accessibility Initiative, DAISY Consortium and international bodies including the United Nations and the World Health Organizations (WHO) attended the summit. At this meeting with Mr Gates, MS assured that the Digital Right Movement (DRM) would not affect the accessibility and the MS next Operating System would include more accessible features.

Synchronized Multimedia Integration Language (SMIL) met from 6 to 9 September 2004 in Japan. SMIL synchronized different media ( audio, text, and graphic) adding more features to support the mobile phone accessibility. Many corporations now grew interest in this SMIL 1, and 3.0.


The United States Government announced the National Voluntary File Format Standard based on HTML, DAISY 3, ANSI/NISO Z 39.86. The national standard is to be adopted by the Government to support DAISY DTD or Z39.86 document file. MS will support it in the next version of the MS Office1.


UNESCAP Secretariat reported that a set of indicators had been developed and proposed at the Regional Workshop on Monitoring the implementation of the BMF held from 13 to 15 October 2004. However, for the BMF priority area six, “Access to information and communications, including information, communication and assistive technologies,” it was difficult to identify usable statistical indicators, thus policy indicators were more usable (e.g. international ICT standard, national ICT standard). The Task Force members agreed on this assessment.

1When this new standard is applied, users will be able to choose an accessible format upon saving a file.

d. Women with disabilities (WWD)

The Task Force reported on a recent achievement made at the High-level Intergovernmental Meeting to Review Regional Implementation of the Beijing Platform for Action, held from 7 to 10 September 2004. Three Task Force members participated in the Meeting, read a Statement on behalf of the Task Force at the plenary session. A part of the Statement was reflected in an official final report, which will be submitted to the Commission on the Status of Women to be held March 2005, in New York. A copy of the Statement is attached in the draft Minutes of the Task Force.

The Task Force reaffirmed the importance of lobbying to mainstream disabled women’s issues in a gender field. Thus it agreed on concrete action plans. Ms Nareewan will approach Thai National Council on Women on possible joint activities. She will also ensure the establishment of a subcommittee on women with disabilities within the RI Asia-Pacific and mainstreaming of women with disabilities at the regional RI conference, which is to be held from 29 November to 2 December, 2006.

The Task Force agreed that Ms Farida Yesmin, Executive Director of Disabled Rehabilitation & Research Association (DRRA), Bangladesh, will be a new coordinator of the Task Force replacing Ms Supattraporn Tanatikom.

e. Self-help Organizations (SHOs)

A representative from the Asia-Pacific Development Centre on Disability (APCD) reported on a recent APCD training on the development of self-help groups, held from 10 to 30 August 2004 in Thailand. This training was targeted on only three countries (Cambodia, Myanmar and Thailand) in order to have effective formation of the self-help groups. Task Force supported the APCD strategy of empowering self-help groups as a part of Community-Based Rehabilitation (CBR) or community development, with active participation of persons with disabilities.

The Task Force examined proposed indicators of the BMF targets 1 and 2, which were developed at the Regional Workshop on monitoring the implementation of the BMF. It agreed that binominal indicators for asking whether policies or mechanisms exist for supporting self-help organizations would be merely the first step and there should be a comprehensive set of indicators to ensure the appropriate budget, and implementation of the policies or mechanisms.

The Task Force discussed in depth on other issues on government support for self-help organizations and different interpretations of “self-help,” and “decision-making by persons with disabilities.” It agreed, however, that, in any case, dignity of persons with disabilities should be respected, and there should be a clear distinction between supporting persons with disabilities for decision-making and representing them on their behalf.

Mr Topong Khulkhanchit, a coordinator for the Task Force, reported on Thai disabled people’s recommendations submitted to the Governor of Bangkok at the 6th Asia-Pacific City Summit (1 December 2004). The recommendations included the adherence to the BMF, provision of accessibility at the forth-coming political election and ensuring non-handicapping environments.

f. Post-conflict Countries

Timor Leste

Further development of the project on CBR and income generation of persons with disabilities in Timor Leste was reported. Thanks to efforts by Dr. Joseph Kwok (RI Hong Kong), approximately US$ 45,000 was mobilized from the Hong Kong Trust to support its second phase in collaboration with Hong Kong China, Timor Leste, Japan and Indonesia. As matching fund, approximately US$ 15,000 was raised by a NGO in Japan (through Mr.Maruyama). With this initial seed money, a NGO, Katilosa (RI Timor Leste) will inaugurate this new phase on CBR and income generation (CBR based on social model), in collaboration with the CBR Development and Training Center (Dr.Handojo Tjandrakusuma) in Solo, Indonesia. The project will be implemented by Katilosa and the Department of Labour and Solidarity in Timor Leste.

Afghanistan

ILO reported that an ILO in-country advisor on employment and training of persons with disabilities was recently appointed for the post in Kabul, and he started his assignment from September 2004 for the period of 12 months. His assignment includes provision of technical advisory services to the Government and other stakeholders, regarding implementation of relevant projects in Afghanistan, and formulation of a national policy on disability. According to the report, he already initiated his work-plan and proposals, with particular focus on (i) inclusive vocational skill training, and (2) employment promotion of persons with disabilities, based on an integrated approach (“mainstreaming disability” into the existing ILO projects in the country and any other national projects).

UNDP has initiated a new project with the total budget of $ 9.4 million for the initial period of 3 years on disability (replacing the former UNDP/UNOPS project). The main activities of this project include (1) raising awareness, (2) capacity building, (3) establishment of national structure (such as NCC), (4) policy formulation, and (5) research development.

Other conflict affected countries

The UNESCAP region’s Decades influenced other developing countries positively. About other conflict countries, the Arab Decade of Disabled Person (2004-2013) was officially proclaimed at the Arab Summit held in Tunis in May 2004.

Other matters

The Task Force recognized that numbers of participants in its meetings had continued to decrease though it was making a good and steady progress. Thus it agreed that the future sessions of the Task Force would be based on ad-hoc and online until further notice. This will solve the problem of time conflicts for the TWG-DC itself, giving more time to other bigger taskforce groups.

g. Proposed International Convention on Persons with Disabilities

Ms Kay Nagata, a member of the Task Force, reported on the context and content of the “Joint Statement on Proposed Structure, Elements and Principles of a Comprehensive and Integral Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities,” the outcome document of the UNESCAP/Asia and Pacific Disability Forum (APDF) Workshop on Regional Follow-up to the Third and Fourth Sessions of the Ad Hoc Committee on a Comprehensive and Integral International Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Rights and Dignity of Persons with Disabilities (Bangkok, 10-11 October 2004).

Ms Nagata reported that the statement was officially signed and submitted from Mr Kim Hak-Su, Executive Secretary of UNESCAP to H.E. Mr Luis Gallegos Chiriboga, Chairman, Ad Hoc Committee, with a copy attached to the Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA) in New York and Sheikha (Ms) Hesa K.A. Al-Thani, Special Rapportuer on Disability of the Commission for Social Development

Main points of the Statement are 1) reaffirming he partnership between Governments and persons with disabilities, NGOs, 2) urging the elaboration process be both timely and in effective manner, 3) encouraging inclusion of persons with disabilities in all aspects of a process, including a Government delegation to the Ad Hoc Committee, and 4) a special attention given to disability inclusive international cooperation projects and evaluation.

The Task Force was with a view that, as a process of elaboration and negotiation on the convention becomes more and more government-focused, participation of persons with disabilities in the process, through the national-level lobbying or becoming a part of a Government delegation becomes critical.

Another member of the Task Force, Mr Monthian Buntan reviewed substantive issues on a current draft. According to him, the first reading of the draft up to the Article 15 was completed (except Article 3 on definition) and the rest will be pursued at the forthcoming Ad Hoc Committee held from the end of January to the beginning of February in 2005. Many unsettled issues remain in the part of the first reading, and they include the following: 1) international cooperation; 2) Progressive realization of social-economic rights; 3) Article 5 (attitude should be included or not); 4)Article on statistics/data(should be a part of monitoring article or not), 5) “non-discrimination” convention (EU strongly advocates) versus “social development “convention; 6) A separate article on women submitted by Republic of Korea (but EU are against it; 7) adequacy of “supported decision-making” mainly advocated by WNUSP and II in article 9; 8) highly sensitive “choice” on forms of education in an article 17 .

V. EVALUTION OF ACHIVEMENTS AND SHORTCOMINGS OF UNESCAP ACTITIVIES BY MEMBERS OF THE TWG-DC AND THE PROPOSED UNESCAP FUTURE WORK TOWARDS THE MID-POINT REVIEW (2007) OF THE ASIAN AND PACIFIC DECADE OF DISABLED PERSONS (2003-2012)

UNESCAP Secretariat summarized a review paper which compiled replies to a questionnaire circulated by the Secretariat to the TWG-DC members with an aim to evaluate UNESCAP activities for the Decade and the BMF2. Details of the evaluation will be seen at http://www.worldenable.net/bmf2004/docworking3.htm

The Secretariat reported that the findings of the evaluation were reflected on the activities by UNESCAP from 2005 to 2006: 1) International Convention (targeted at NGOs and Governments, 2005- 2006); 2) Formulation of national policy (Governments, 2005); 3) Disability statistics (Governments, 2005); 4) CBR and poverty alleviation (NGO, 2005); 5) Self-help groups (NGOs and Governments, 2006); 6) Mid-point review of the BMF in 2007.

The Secretariat presented the following strategies towards the mid-point review of the BMF in 2007: 1) By the 10th Session of the TWG-DC (June 2005), the Ad Hoc Working Group on the BMF Review and Revision will be formed; 2) By the 11th Session of the TWG-DC, to be held in conjunction with the General Assembly of the APDF (November 2005 in Melbourne), the first revised text will be submitted for discussion; 3) At the 12th Session of the TWG-DC (June 2006), the revised text will be discussed and adopted; 5) The adopted text will be submitted to the Expert Group Meeting(EGM), to be held during the fourth quarter of 2006, for discussion and adoption; 6) The final draft of the EGM will be studied at the 13th Session of the TWG-DC; 7) The final EGM draft will be submitted to the High Level Inter-governmental Meeting on the Mid-point Review, to be held during the fourth quarter of 2007.

The participants of the TWG-DC agreed on these proposed strategies, and Ms Penny Price, Mr Bill Brohier, Ms Debra Perry (ILO), and the APDF nominated themselves as the members of the Ad Hoc Working Group. Additional members could be recruited at a later stage.

UNESCAP Secretariat pointed out that the purpose of the BMF review and revision is not to expand and dilute the existing text but to issue a supplementary text. The purposes for the supplementary text are; 1) to update the text in line with current disability regional and global context; 2) to add priority areas, targets or strategies if there is a strong opinion to do so with a convincing reason; 3) to merge, if necessary, priority areas or strategies for more coordinated and effective implementation (e.g. priority areas 1 and 2, priority areas 5 and 6); 4) to develop a set of indicators to effectively monitor the progress of the implementation of the BMF.

2Ms Debra Perry pointed out that “Training and employment, including self-employment” was not included in the original questionnaire. Thus, it was decided that it would be included in the following third round.

VI. REPORT ON THE UNESCAP/ APDF WORKSHOP ON REGIONAL FOLLOW-UP TO THE THIRD AND FOURTH SESSIONS OF THE AD HOC COMMITTEE ON A COMPREHENSIVE AND INTEGRAL INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION ON THE PROTECTION AND PROMOTION OF THE RIGHTS AND DIGNITY OF PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES (11-12 OCTOBER 2004, UNCC, BANGKOK )

On behalf of the APDF, Mr Graham Smith of Disability Australia, briefed about the UNESCAP/APDF Workshop on Regional Follow-up to the Third and Fourth Sessions of the Ad Hoc Committee on a Comprehensive and Integral International Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Rights and Dignity of Persons with Disabilities (Bangkok, 10-11 October 2004) and described the outcome document , “Joint Statement on Proposed Structure, Elements and Principles of a Comprehensive and Integral Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.”

VII. MATTERS CONCERNING THE PLANNED APDF GENERAL ASSEMBLY IN 2005 AND THE 11TH SESSION OF THE TWG-DC

On behalf of the APDF, Mr Graham Smith of Disability Australia presented the most updated plan on the Second General Assembly (GA) of the APDF to be held Melbourne, Australia, November 2005. According to the presentation, the proposed APDF GA will be from 19 to 21. The Task Forces of the 11th Session of the TWG-DC will be incorporated in the agenda of the GA. On 22 November 2005, plenary session of the 11th Session of the TWG-DC will be held. As indicated in the section V, participants of the TWG-DC agreed to add a session on the BMF review and revision as a part of the agenda, after the GA.

VIII. REPORT ON THE PLANNED ACTIVITIES IN OBSERVANCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL DAY OF DISABLED PERSONS, TO BE HELD ON 3 DECEMBER 2004, UNCC BANGKOK

UNESCAP Secretariat announced that a commemorative event in observance of the International Day of Disabled Persons, 3 December, would be held on that day at the United Nations Conference Centre (UNCC). The theme of this year was “Nothing about Us without Us,” a motto of international disability movements to ensure participation of, by and for persons with disabilities in all concerned aspects of their life.

IX. REPORTS OF FUTURE ACTIVITIES (ILO, CBM/ICEVI)

ILO

Debra Perry of the ILO reported on recent activities and planned future activities. The focus of ILO activities was shifted from regional networking to country-specific advisory services. Its current target countries include China, Republic of Korea, Laos and Mongolia. Recent publication projects were introduced, including “CBR: A strategy for Rehabilitation, Equalization of Opportunities, Poverty Reduction and Social Inclusion of People with Disabilities,” jointly produced with WHO and UNESCO.

CBM/ICEVI

Mr Bill Brohier, Regional Advisor, Education of Visually Impaired Persons, Christoffel –Blindenmission (CBM), and the Past President of International Council for Education of People with Visual Impairment (ICEVI), reported on the mission and activities of both organizations.

X. OTHER MATTERS

The dates of the 10th Session of the TWG-DC and the Workshop by The Task Force on Employment and Poverty Alleviation will be finalized later but before 31 December 2004.

An agreement was reached as to restructuring of convening of the Task Force meetings. Though the present seven Task Forces will remain as they are, the following changes will be made: 1) the Task Force on Post conflict Countries will be held on either ad-hoc or on-line basis; 2) the Task Force on Women with Disabilities and the Task Force on Self-help Organizations will be merged into one meeting; 3) the Task Force on Employment and Poverty Alleviation and the Task Force on Education for All will be held in the morning so that the meeting participants can attend the both meetings.

0800-1030 Education of All Children and Youth with Disabilities (EFA)
1030-1300 Employment and Poverty Alleviation
1300-1400 Lunch break
1400-1530 1) Information and Communication Technology (ICTS)
1400-1530 2) Women with Disabilities and Self-help Organizations of Persons with Disabilities (SHOs)
1530-1630 Proposed International Convention on Persons with Disabilities

At the plenary session, the facilitator of each Task Force must make the report as before.

 

ANNEX I

LIST OF PARTICIPANTS

2 December 2004

UNITED NATIONS
ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMISSION FOR ASIA AND THE PACIFIC
Regional Coordination Mechanism

Ninth Session of the Thematic Working Group on Disability-related Concerns
1-2 December 2004
Bangkok

LIST OF PARTICIPANTS

THAILAND
Ms Ormporn Nithayasuthi
Director, Bureau of the Empowerment for Persons with Disabilities
Ministry of Social Development and Human Security, Bangkok

Mr Pat Watanasin
Social Worker, Bureau of the Empowerment for Persons with Disabilities
Ministry of Social Development and Human Security, DPW 60th Anniversary Building, 255 Rajvithi Road Rajthewee, Bangkok

Ms Vijit Kaaewkkerwan
Bureau of the Empowerment for Persons with Disabilities
Ministry of Social Development and Human Security, Bangkok

Asia-Pacific Development Center on Disability (APCD)

Mr Hisao Chiba,
JICA-APCD Expert on ICT
Asia-Pacific Development Center on Disability (APCD), Bangkok

Ms Jirat Wachirasereechai
HRD Chief, Asia-Pacific Development Center on Disability (APCD), Bangkok

Ms Lasapan Toomsawasdi,
ICT Chief, Asia-Pacific Development Center on Disability (APCD), Bangkok

Ms Phatcharamont Phanthong,
Asia-Pacific Development Center on Disability (APCD), Bangkok

UNITED NATIONS AGENCIES, SPECIALIZED AGENCIES

International Labour Organization (ILO), Thailand

Ms Debra Perry,
Senior Specialist in Vocational Rehabilitation for the Asia and Pacific Region, EASMAT, Bangkok

Ms Anne Holopainen, EASMAT, Bangkok

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Thailand
Mr Jon F. Kapp, Assessment, Information Systems, Monitoring and Statistics Unit (AIMS), Bangkok

NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS AND OTHER ENTITLES

Association for Career Advancement of the Blind, Thailand
Ms Sawart Pramoonsilp

Christoffel-Blindenmission (CBM/SEAPRO) and International Council for Education of People with Visual Impairment (ICEVI), Malaysia

Mr William G. Brohier,
Regional Adviser, Education of Visually Impaired Persons, CBM Christoffel Blindenmission Christian Blind Mission E.V., & Past President, International Council for Education of People with Visual Impairment

Disability Australia, Australia Mr Graham Smith, Secretary

Disabled Rehabilitation & Research Association (DRRA), Bangladesh Ms Farida Yesmin, Executive Director


Disabled Peoples’ International (DPI), Thailand
Mr Topong Kulkhanchit, Regional Development Officer

Ms Thitima Ratanachaiyaphan

Foundation for the Employment Promotion of the Blind, Thailand
Mr Pecharat Techavachara, President

Hilton/Perkins Program, Thailand Mr Kirk Horton

National Association of the Deaf in Thailand (NADT), Thailand

Ms Panomwan Boontem, President

Ms Nongluk Sengchan

Ms Puangpet Limpisuree, Sign Language Interpreter

Mr Pongpun Vorapipatkumtorn

Parents’ Association of the Intellectually Impaired, Thailand Ms Phoranee Louineau, President

Rehabilitation International, Regional Committee for Asia and the Pacific (RI)
Ms Nareewan Chintakanond, Associate Professor

Ms Penelope Price, Chair RI Education Commission

Thai Association of the Blind (TAB), Thailand
Mr Monthian Buntan, President

Yooralla Society of Victoria, Australia
Mr Bryan Thomas Woodford, Immediate Past President, ACROD Ltd.,

VSO Thailand, Thailand Ms Kanikar Sittisak, Programme Support Officer

Ms Umarat Decharin

Ms Treeyarak Meebutpakdee

SECRETARIAT

Mr Kim Hak-Su Executive Secretary

Ms Keiko Okaido
Deputy Executive Secretary
Mr Daewan Choi Special Assistant to the Executive Secretary and Secretary of the Commission
______________

Ms Thelma Kay Director,
Emerging Social Issues Division

Mr Bhakta Gubhaju Officer-in-Charge,
Population and Social Integration Section, Emerging Social Issues Division

Ms Kay Nagata
Social Affairs Officer,
Population and Social Integration Section, Emerging Social Issues Division

Ms Aiko Akiyama
Project Expert on Disability,
Population and Social Integration Section, Emerging Social Issues Division

______________

Mr Peter Van Laere Chief, Administrative Services Division

Mr Anmin Yin Officer-in-Charge, a.i., of the Conference Services Section, Administrative Services Division

______________

Mr David Lazarus Chief, United Nations Information Services

______________


ANNEX II

DRAFT MINUTES OF THE TASK FORCES HELD AT THE EIGHTH SESSION OF THE THEMATIC WORKING GROUP ON DISABILITY-RELATED CONCERNS (TWG-DC)

Annex II (a)

Employment and Poverty Alleviation Task Force

1. Ms Debra Perry, ILO, chaired the meeting and welcomed participants. Each participant introduced him-or herself. Ten individuals representing UN agencies and DPOs participated in the meeting. (See appendix 1 for list of all attendees.) The chairperson praised particularly the presence of the DPOs. Ms Anne Holopainen took minutes.

2. The Chairman presented the following agenda:

  1. Welcome and self-introductions
  2. Adoption of the agenda
  3. Review and adoption of the minutes
  4. Progress reports from task force members on activities related to employment and training and poverty alleviation targets, actions, etc.
  5. Action items from prior meetings
    a. List-serve
    b. Linkage to education task force
  6. Poverty Alleviation and Multinational Roundtable Meeting---June
    a. Review of progress, funding, integration of two meetings, etc.
    b. Date and logistics
    c. Review of poverty alleviation day
    d. Review of working paper for multinational roundtable day
    e. Review of paper for multinationals
    f. Agenda ideas for Roundtable
    g. Criteria for selecting multinationals
    h. Criteria for selecting participants
    i. Next steps
  7. Items from prior meetings
    a. Employer awards
    b. Other
  8. New business

3. The minutes from the Employment and Poverty Alleviation Task Force meeting held on 15th June 2004 were reviewed. The Chairperson noted that she will go back to the minutes and make some corrections.

4. Debra briefed the task force members on the progress related to employment and training and poverty alleviation targets:

  1. Ratification of the ILO Convention 159 on Vocational Rehabilitation and Employment of Disabled Persons: Fiji is ratifying the convention and Sri Lanka has requested the ILO collaboration with holding a national meeting to promote the process and decent work policies for people with disabilities.
  2. New publications: The ILO has released a new publication on legislation guidelines, “Achieving Equal Employment Opportunities for People with Disabilities through Legislation: Guidelines’. A leaflet concentrating on CBR, called “CBR: A Strategy for Rehabilitation, Equalization of Opportunities, Poverty Reduction and Social Inclusion of People with Disabilities’ will also be published soon.
  3. The Washington Group, funded by World Bank, is a group of experts that is developing methods for collecting disability statistics worldwide. It recently met in Bangkok. ESCAP’s statistician is actively involved with the group as is an ILO expert in Geneva, who has already conducted some preliminary research. He will develop guidelines that will contribute to the collection of labour market information of people with disabilities in line with the guidance of the Washington Group.
  4. ILO Disability Advisor in Afghanistan: A new disability specialist has started his work in Afghanistan. The Advisor has already made an impact on disability issues. He will assist the UNDP funded project to advise on disability issues and has worked with the government to second two internal staff to work on disability issues; he has secured funding for two additional staff, all who will work toward inclusion and programmes to address the needs of disabled persons.
  5. Country level activities: Six officials from Laos comprising of representatives from the Ministry of Labour and Social Welfare, Lao Disabled People’s Association, Lao National Chamber of Commerce and Industry and Lao Federation of Trade Union, are currently taking part in a study to Vietnam and Cambodia. The tour is aimed to have impact on developing the policies and the multisectoral coordinative body in disability matters in Laos.
  6. Korean government funds for prospective study tour---fostering interregional cooperation: Participants from Vietnam, China, Thailand and Mongolia will take part in a study tour to South Korea. She noted that based on her recent mission to the Republic of Korea that she learned that South Korea is placing greater emphasis on people with severe disabilities as well as on mainstreaming.
  7. Brian Woodford shared his experiences from a meeting held in Hong Kong in October as South Korea had fully accessible IT tools for disabled persons to access services. Kay Nagata noted that Korea is rated second in the application of the IT in the world.
  8. Regarding other ILO activities, Debra noted that awareness raising for employers has been done and many documents have been translated for governments and social partners in the region.
  9. Debra noted that the Pacific Forum plans to sponsor a meeting on disability in Fiji in September 2005. The ILO plans to participate.

5. Brian Woodford commented that Workability International is growing in organizational size and influence and suggested greater linkage between employments focused groups and Workability, which just had its congress in Christchurch, New Zealand. He pointed out that well known organizations such as Reemploy and Shaw Trust are active members.

6. Issues related to communication were raised. It was acknowledged that task force members and other parties should be more aware of the actions of each other and ways to facilitate this were discussed. Video conference was agreed to be cost-effective means of organizing a meeting. It was noted by Kay Nagata that this issue would be raised at other points during the TWG meeting.

7. Kay Nagata briefed the participants on the three meetings in October. First was the APDF forum on NGOs, second the Regional Workshop on Monitoring the Implementation of the BMF and third the joint ESCAP and CDPF meeting in China on poverty alleviation which included site visits to several impressive programmes in China. Kay shared an excellent video which demonstrated some of the rural based poverty alleviation activities that the Chinese Government has sponsored for people with disabilities.

8. Action items from the prior meetings very briefly referred to due to absence of the persons responsible of the matters.

  1. Debra urged the task force members to actively use the email and particularly the list-serve when communicating on the task force matters, especially the upcoming multinational meeting.
  2. The linkage to the education task force was duly noted as well and that Mr. Jason Mc. Kay has agreed to be the link. However, Jason was unable to attend the TWG due to injury.

9. Poverty Alleviation and Multinational Roundtable Meeting were discussed. The following are some of the main points:

  • The structure and dates for the meetings: Workshop on Poverty Alleviation will be held on the first day, the Multinational Roundtable Meeting on the second day, followed by two days of the 10th session of TWG-DC ESCAP meetings. Two alternative dates were considered: the week starting on 20th June 2005 or the week starting on 4 July 2005. It was agrees that everyone would check their respective commitments and Kay would consult with CDPF since the Poverty Alleviation meeting is sponsored by them.
  • Participants: Kay Nagata noted that the ESCAP invites representatives from China, Bangladesh, India, Cambodia, Vietnam, Philippines and Fiji. The participants will be mainly from the government. Ms. Nagata though noted that it will be good to introduce them to the multinational representatives. The ILO will also fund participants from the countries where the multinationals operate (see next paragraph), as the budget allows
  • Funding: Besides funding the participants from the seven countries, ESCAP will provide space and technical equipment for the entire two-day meeting. The ILO will cover the costs of lunch, refreshments, and documentation for the multinational day and with the remaining funds will cover the costs of participants from countries of particular interest to the multinationals.
  • The purpose of the meeting: The overall aim is to foster dialogue and promote partnership between the companies and respective employment and training organizations in specific countries in the region with the purpose of fostering hiring disabled workers and human resource development of people with disabilities. (See appendix 2 for the Draft Working Paper).
  • Prerequisites for the selection of the companies: The criteria for targeting multinational companies was discussed with the following agreed upon: multinationals have interest in several countries in the region, task force members may have some contact with the company already, the companies have a reputation as good employers and perhaps some indication of interest in hiring workers with disabilities. The countries and location of factories has to be taken into consideration as well. Those with regional headquarters in Bangkok might be more interested in participating and would be easier to ensure active follow-up. The issue of duplication and involvement of competing companies was also discussed. It was agreed that companies from the same sectors can be included---such as two car or computer companies, for example in order to get coverage from companies originating from various continents.
  • The Multinational Companies to be researched: The group generated a list of 12 multinationals to target, with a goal of getting 6 to 8 to commit to participating. Task force members volunteered to conduct initial research on each company. The list of companies and those who will research them is in Appendix 3.
  • The steps and tentative timetable for the action: The initial research will involve identifying the company’s social responsibility policies, community development initiatives and more specifically, to explore which companies have policies for disabled employees and/or special products and services for disabled persons. The first stage will be conducted on the basis of Internet research, by using contacts and/or by calling to the company if it doesn’t cause undue expense. The results of the research will be shared with the group during mid-February. Since most of the participants are in Bangkok, this may even be done in person. The research items for the first step of the process are presented in the Appendix 4. Following the February meeting where the decisions on the suitable and willing companies are made, further contacts will be completed by 15th March. Subsequent surveys on the interests and needs of the multinationals will be conducted. The specific companies and all participants to meet their interests and needs will be identified by the beginning of May.
  • Other issues that came up with respect to the process: Brian Woodford pointed out that it makes a difference budget wise whether the meeting is held in June or July. He also noted that it should be noted to the companies that it’s a matter a business and not charity when contacting the companies. The ILO will seek the participation of its PR department in this regard. Debra also reminded the group about the Unlocking Potential booklet that had been distributed at prior meetings, which outlines the business case for hiring, which should form the basis of this meeting. The companies are expected to cover their expenses for meeting participation.

10. Items from prior meetings were briefly noted due to the shortage of time.

  • The issue of employers’ awards can be taken up after the poverty alleviation/multinational meeting.
  • Monthien Buntan noted that efforts to ban massage businesses operated by the blind and efforts to prevent blind individuals from become masseuses was blocked by the disability movement in Thailand and the group applauded this success.


Appendix 1

Multinational Corporation Roundtable on Disability and Employment

Draft Working Paper

Background

The Employment and Poverty Alleviation Task Force of the Thematic Working Group on Disability Related Concerns has decided to hold a multinational roundtable to discuss how multinational companies can work with NGOs, governments and international organization to increase employment opportunities for people with disabilities and thereby decrease their poverty. This approach is fully consistent with the ILO Decent Work Agenda and its focus in the region to assist people with disability work out of poverty. The meeting will be funded by the ILO and ESCAP. It is envisioned to be a relatively small working meeting, with about six multinational companies represented and about 40 participants.

Date and Venue

The date of meeting will be June 2005. It will be held after the TWG meeting and will form one day of the ESCAP Poverty Alleviation meeting to allow for cost sharing between ESCAP and ILO and to meet mutual objectives. It is suggested that if the budget allows a half-day working meeting follows the multinational meeting for participants to formulate a specific action plan for follow-up on the meeting findings and recommendations.

Objectives

The overall objective of the meeting is to foster a dialogue between multinationals and disability stakeholders to explore how multinationals can contribute to the implementation of the training and employment of people with disabilities and also benefit in terms of workforce diversity and the business case for hiring disabled workers.

The specific objectives of the proposed meeting and related planning and follow-up activities are to:

  • Determine ways that multinationals can contribute to the spirit, targets and actions of the BMF, specifically those that related to training and employment as well as to implement the ILO Code of Practice;
  • Develop positive attitudes and interest among multinationals about the hiring and human resource development of disabled workers;
  • Develop greater skills and awareness among service providers about how to approach multinationals at country-level;
  • Share examples of good practice regarding current activities between multinationals and service providers;
  • Create initial linkages between multinationals and service providers at the country level;
  • Create a follow-up plan of action for the TWG Task Force on Employment and Poverty Alleviation with regard to follow-up with multinational companies, both those that participated and other multinationals; and
  • Make recommendations for future activities among all key stakeholders.

Expected Outputs

Specific

At the end of the meeting and the follow-up activities it is expected that there will be the following
outputs:

  • Case studies and examples of good practice
  • Meeting proceedings that capture recommendations and an action plan
  • Linkages between certain multinationals and country-level service providers
  • Identified strategies about how to work how multinationals and other stakeholders can work together to achieve mutual goals

General

The TWG task force will have a plan of action for follow-up with each multinational present as well as how to expand the network to others in the region. It is also expected that the multinational representatives will each make on commitment to follow-up on the issues addressed at the meeting and will be more aware of the BMF, ILO Code of Practice and the business case for hiring workers with disabilities. All participants will be more aware of multinational corporation activities related to the employment and/or poverty alleviation of people with disabilities.

Desired Impact

It is hoped that the meeting will be both the beginning of a dialogue between international organizations, NGOs and Government service providers as well as yield some specific linkages that have direct and practical ramifications for the employment and alleviation of poverty for people with disabilities at country level. Further, it is hoped that the meeting will be the beginning of a regional network among multinationals that might later include employers’ organizations and others interested in collaboration on issues related to disability in the workplace.

Work Plan

Main Task Steps
1. Formation of task force subcommittee on multinationals and complete research required prior to inviting participants
  • Organize task force (done)
  • Establish date and objectives of meeting (done)
  • Develop a criteria for approaching multinationals
  • Research possible multinationals for participation in the meeting
  • Survey targeted multinationals regarding interest in participating in the meeting and about their regional needs with regard to their business activities/human resource needs, especially countries where they would be most interested in hiring
  • Survey/match their needs and interest to task force members to ensure that appropriate representatives are at the meeting
  • Finalize the list of participants who should be present at the meeting
2. Plan for and hold roundtable meeting inclusive of task force members, other participants and multinational companies 7.2
  • Finalize budget
  • Finalize agenda, speakers and activities
  • Determine financial need of proposed participants and criteria for providing stipends
  • Finalize logistics (location, time, etc.)
  • Send out invitations with appropriate background information
  • Confirm participants who will attend
  • Hold meeting
3. Establish linkages and conduct follow-up activities
  • Conduct research as noted in 1 and 2
  • Design the meeting agenda and activities in 2 to facilitate linkage development
  • Record intentions in action plans, meeting proceedings etc.
  • Provide follow-up and technical assistance to ensure the success of linkages established
  • Monitor activities of the linkages and the plan of action
4. Finalize meeting proceedings
  • Design meeting activities to facilitate the development of action plans and recommendations
  • Identify a recorder and photographer
  • Record meeting proceedings, recommendations and action plans
  • Prepare draft document to include action plans and recommendations meeting proceedings
  • Circulate document among task force members
  • Finalize and post on ILO and ESCAP web sites and circulate to all members

Inputs

Financial Inputs

Workshop

  • Cost of meeting hall
  • Refreshments and lunch
  • Equipment

Stipends for travel and DSA of participants

  • Stipends for selected participants from developing countries who are unable to shoulder costs of meeting (selected according to targeted interest of multinationals invited and financial need of service provider in targeted country)

It is anticipated that corporations will cover their own costs for participation.

Human Resource Inputs
ILO Senior Specialist in Vocational Rehabilitation
ILO Associate Expert
ESCAP Disability Specialists
TWG Task force members---Working Group on the Multinational Roundtable

Target Group

  • Multinational corporations (six are anticipated for participation in the meeting) who have an interest in meeting their human resource needs by hiring people with disabilities or their corporate responsibility needs by taking other actions that will contribute to the poverty alleviation and promote decent work among people with disabilities.
  • Service providers (NGOs, Government, trade union or international organizations) in the region, especially those who are TWG and Employment and Poverty Alleviation subcommittee members and/or who represent countries of specific interest to the invited multinationals
  • People with disabilities


Appendix 2

Companies to be researched (and further contacted) for the
Multinational Roundtable Meeting in 2005

COMPANY
PERSON RESPONSIBLE
TO RESEARCH AND CONTACT
IBM (already contacted) Debra Perry
Toyota Pecharat Techavachara
Bata Shoes Jason Mc Kay
Nike Debra Perry/Anne Holopainen
Honda Kay Nagata
HSBC Debra Perry
IKEA Debra Perry/Anne Holopainen
KPMG and other financial type institutions Brian Woodford
Microsoft Monthien Buntan
Motorola Debra Perry
Nokia Anne Holopainen
Marriott (already committed to participating) Debra Perry

 

Appendix 3

Research Items for Multinational Companies

Instructions: Please use the following data points to collect information about the multinational company you are researching. Please use the Internet to answer these questions, and/or call the company if you can do so without incurring undue expense. If you have information from other sources, please identify the source of information. This information will be shared with the Multinational Roundtable Meeting Working Group no later than mid-February.

Name of company:

Web site address:

Headquarters location:

Regional office address:

Regional contacts: (list all that apply…for human resource, community services, corporate social responsibility---give name, address, phone/email)

Describe the nature of the business and possible employment opportunities:

Describe policy related to employment and people with disabilities:

Describe any data or information available regarding actual hiring practices:

Describe any information available about partnerships or work on disability issues, including names and if possible, contact information of partners:

Describe the company’s social responsibility statement or any other related policies or programmes:


Describe any company awareness of people with disabilities as a customer:

Describe the locations of operations in the region (this might include the countries where they operate, have offices/factories or in which they have work with subcontracting companies):

If you or anyone in the TWG/disability network has any connections to this company, please describe:

Other comments/information of relevance:

Person preparing this report:

Attendance Sheet

Employment and Poverty Alleviation Task Force

No.
Name
Organization
Email address
1 Brian Woodford ACROD and YOORALLA Society of Victoria ceo@yooralla.com.au
2 Pecharat Techavachara Foundation for the Employment Promotion of the Blind (FEPB) fepb@internetksc.th.com
3 Panomwan Boontem National Association of the Deaf in Thailand (NADT) nadtthai@mweb.co.th
4 Puangpet Limpisuree National Association of the Deaf in Thailand (NADT)  
5 Monthian Buntan Thai Association of the Blind (TAB) mbuntan@tab.or.th
6 Panjarat Chantria Disabled Peoples’ International Thailand (DPI)  
7 Kay Nagata ESCAP nagata@un.org
8 Aiko Akiyama ESCAP akiyama@un.org
9 Debra Perry ILO perry@ilo.org
10 Anne Holopainen ILO holopainen@ilo.org
11 Ms Sawart Pramoonsilp The Association for Career Advancement of the Blind  

 

Annex II (b)

Education for All Children and Youth with Disabilities (EFA)


1. Opening of the meeting

The eighth session of the Task Force on Education for all Children and Youth with Disabilities was chaired by Mr Bill Brohier. The session was attended by 15 members. The meeting was delighted to extend a special welcome to Khun Nareewan Chinatakanond, recently elected Regional Chair of RI Asia-Pacific. We very much appreciated the fact that she found the time to attend our meeting. We also welcomed a number of other participants who attended for the first time. These included Khun Pat from the Bureau of Empowerment for Persons with Disabilities, and Khun Tree and Khun Decharin who were representing VSO, Thailand. We very much hope that they will continue to attend our meetings. We were very pleased also to welcome Jon Kapp once again from UNESCO.

2. Adoption of the Agenda

The following agenda was adopted

  1. Welcome and self introductions
  2. Adoption of the Agenda
  3. Confirmation of the Minutes of the seventh session of TF EFA held on 15 June 2004.
  4. Report of TF EFA activities
  5. Report on UNESCO initiatives by Jon Kapp, 'Assistant Programme Manager', AIMS Unit, UNESCO.
  6. Flagship for Persons with Disabilities: Towards Inclusion Formation of the Asia/Pacific Regional Flagship Working Group

    a) Clarification of management and integration with TF EFA
    b) Call for recommendations on expanded membership
    c) TOR updated
  7. Report of the 4th Ad Hoc Meeting to draft text for an international convention to promote and protect the rights and dignity of persons with disabilities, held in New York, 24 May – 8 June 2004. IDA draft text for Article 17. 5th Ad Hoc Meeting: 24 January – 4 February 2005
  8. Reports from TF EFA members
    a) Graham Smith: Disability Standards
  9. Other matters

3. Report of TF EFA activities

Penny Price attended the RI Congress held in Oslo in June 2004. She was elected Chair of the RI Education Commission and presented a paper on the Right to Education for All Children with disabilities: From Myth to reality. Associate Professor Khun Nareewan Chintakanond was elected Regional Chair of RI Asia-Pacific, so the regional office of RI now resides in Thailand. We were very happy to have Khun Nareewan attend our TF EFA meeting yesterday for the first time.

A presentation was made on behalf of the TF EFA on the positive implications of Multi-Grade Teaching (MGT) for children with disabilities at a university Conference held in Bangkok in September 2004.

Bill Brohier made a presentation emphasizing the critical importance of Early Intervention at a national Conference held in Malaysia in September 2004.

Bill Brohier attended meetings of ICEVI and CBM in Costa Rica in October 2004 and gave the Closing Address at the ICEVI Sub-regional Conference for Central America on “A United Region for Educational Integration of Persons with Visual Impairment. The theme given to him was: Human Rights – An Utopia?

Penny, in her capacity as Chair of the RI Education Commission, has been involved in working with IDA to draft Article 17 for the UN Convention. Article 17 on education was not discussed at the 4th Ad Hoc meeting but it will be at the 5th session which will be held in January 2005.

A global Meeting on disability has just been held by the World Bank in Washington in November 2004. Olof Sandkull has been attending from UNESCO Bangkok and TF EFA. A symposium was scheduled on Inclusive Education

4. Report by Jon Kapp, AIMS Unit on UNESCO activities

Jon Kapp gave a comprehensive report on the 2 meetings with the theme of Inclusive Education which UNESCO hosted in Bangkok in October 2004: The Regional Workshop on Inclusive Education and the 6th EFA National Coordinators Meeting. Several members of TF EFA attended and made presentations. Very strong and close collaboration between TF EFA and UNESCO has become one of the most significant achievements of the TF EFA

Jon also informed the group that the UNESCO AIMS Unit has started a project on identifying successful strategies for including children with disabilities in school systems and will develop Guidelines to assist Governments and others to develop inclusive education systems. Penny Price is working on this project with Ko-Chih Tung and Jon Kapp. Thailand is one of six countries selected for a case study and extensive visits have been made to the Khon Kaen and Roi-Et area. The project has been extensively assisted by members of TF EFA and would like to thank Khun Prayat and Kirk Horton in particular.

Jon disseminated electronic copies of the recently completed UNESCO Toolkit for Creating Inclusive Learning-Friendly Environments: embracing Diversity. If anyone would like to obtain this resource please contact Jon. E-mail: j.kapp@8unescobkk.org.

He reported too on the launch of the EFA Monitoring Report for 2004, “The Leap to Equality”, which took place in Bangkok on 8th November 2004. The group was concerned at the continuing failure of the EFA reports to provide any detailed information on the status of education for persons with disabilities. The process for preparing the reports is complex and does not allow for easy input. It is hoped that this will change during the decade.

5. Flagship on the Rights to Education for Persons with Disabilities: Towards Inclusion. Asia/Pacific Regional Working Group

An extensive discussion was held on the progress of the Flagship on the Right to Education for Persons with Disabilities: Towards Inclusion. The second Steering Committee meeting of the Flagship on the Right to Education for Persons with Disabilities: Towards Inclusion, scheduled to be held in Bangkok in October 2004, was cancelled for lack of funds but a mini-meeting was held with those members the Secretariat who were in Bangkok to attend the UNESCO meetings. Some achievements of the Flagship made so far include:

  • Completion of an issues paper by John Lawrence with directions for Flagship action planning. An action plan is currently in the process of being developed.
  • A Flagship Working Group on Disability Statistics and Indicators has been formed and held its first meeting in Paris in October 2004. Ko-Chih Tung of the AIMS Unit, UNESCOBKK is a member of this international working group
  • There was agreement in principle to form a Working Group on capacity building and teacher training
  • Regional Asian and Pacific Working Group of the Flagship.

The Terms of Reference (TOR) for an Asian and Pacific Working Group of the Flagship were accepted by the Flagship Secretariat in November 2003. UNESCO Bangkok has however declined to accept the coordination role as specified in the original TOR. An alternative coordination mechanism is currently being worked out with the possibility that responsibility for coordination will be undertaken jointly by a number of agencies, which may include RI Asia Pacific, CBM, UNESCAP and UNESCO Bangkok. Other agencies have offered their services. It is hoped that this process will be finalized by the first meeting of TWGDC in 2005. At this time a recommendation will be put to TWGDC to approve the amalgamation of the TF EFA with the Asian and Pacific Working Group of the Flagship on the Right to Education for Persons with Disabilities: Towards Inclusion. TF EFA has in fact being carrying out the role of the envisaged regional Flagship Working Group since its inception in 2001. Recognition of its work at international level led to the proposal to form the Flagship Working Group with TF EFA as its basis in this region. The Asia Pacific region is the only region so far to form a Regional Working Group of the Flagship.

Ensuring the right to access education for every child and young person in this region is the only means of making sure that the next generation of young people with disabilities is not once again over-represented in statistics on persons living in poverty, and deprived of the opportunities which allow all people to fulfill their own personal potential as well as participating fully in, and contributing to, the societies in which they live. This is one of the goals of the BMF, and was the reason for the establishment of TF EFA in 2001. What we are seeking is to extend and strengthen this work with the amalgamation of TF EFA and the regional Flagship Working Group. In order to achieve this we need commitment from agencies willing to form a partnership to share the work that is needed to make this a reality.

6. Report of the 4th Ad Hoc Meeting and progress towards an international Convention for Persons with Disabilities.

It was noted that at the 4th Ad Hoc Meeting Article 17, addressing education, was not discussed. Monthian provided some insights into aspects of the article that may be controversial during the 5th Ad Hoc Meeting which is scheduled to be held in New York, 24 January 2005.

7. Reports from TF EFA members


Members shared information on a number of topics and there was an extended discussion on the progress being made toward inclusive education since the 1999 Education Act was passed in Thailand. It was recognized that the new system and procedures will take time to be fully effective.

The rights and empowerment of parents, and the problems and challenges they face in both caring for their disabled children and ensuring that they achieve their right to a good education was raised as a very important issue. It was noted that parents organizations face particular difficulties when advocating for their children and often do not receive the same attention or response that is afforded to organizations of persons with disabilities. As children with disabilities are unable to advocate for themselves it is imperative that the voice of parents is treated with the respect it deserves and that the issue of access to quality education is one of the priority issues on the agenda of all disability advocacy groups.

Informative presentations were made on aspects of the national situation for education in Bangladesh and Japan. Graham also reported on the 9-year process that has led to the development of Education Standards which are in the process of being legislated in Australia to prevent discriminatio0n against children and youth with disabilities in the education system. The importance of early intervention, teacher training, and transition to employment and access for students with disabilities to tertiary education was addressed.

Aiko presented the indicators for education that had been developed at the UNESCAP Conference on the targets and indicators for the BMF, at the meeting held in Bangkok in October 2004. She also informed the group that she would be attending an International Conference on Early Intervention in Chennai, organized by an organization which focuses on inclusive community-based service for children with intellectual disabilities, 0-6 year old.

8. Other matters
Graham reported that the 2nd General Assembly and 4 day Conference of APDF will be held in Melbourne from 19-22 November 2005. A meeting of TWGDC may be held in conjunction with this Conference.

Kirk Horton provided advance notice of the ICEVI East Asia Regional Conference which will be held in Jomtien, Thailand, February 20-23 2005.

List of the Participants

TWGDC8 15-16 June 2004
TF EFA 15 June 2004
Participant list
Co-Coordinators    
Penny Price Penelopej2000@yahoo.com RI
Bill Brohier (absent 15.6.04) CBM-SEAPRO & ICEVI brohier@pc.jaring.my
Name Organization E-mail
Australia    
Graham Smith APDF grasm@connexus.net.au
Bangladesh    
Farida Yesmin DRRA sila@agni.com
Thailand    
Poranee Louineau Parents’ Association, Ment. Imp. phoraneelouineau@yahoo.com
Shushira Chonhenchol Handicap International bkkdd@thailand-hi.org
Pat Watanasin Bureau for the Empowerment of PWD patwatanasin@yahoo.com
Nareewan Chintakanond RI AP, Regional Chair nareewan@ncswt.ot.th
Kirk Horton Hilton/Perkins Programme panna@mozart.inet.co.th
Prayat Punongong DPI kkab@loxinfo.co.th
Treeyarak Meebutpablee VSO Thailand treeyarak@inet.co.th
Monthian Buntan   mbuntan@tab.or.th
Decharin Umarat VSO Thailand Tel: 02-6404076
UNESCO    
Jon Kapp UNESCO j.kapp@unescobkk.org
UNESCAP    
Aiko Akiyama ESID akiyama@un.org


Annex II (c)

Information and Communications Technology

(REPORT TO BE INSERTED!)

List of the Participants

No.
Name
Organization
Email address
1 Mr Pongpun Vorapipatkuntorn NADT nadtthai@mweb.co.th
2 Ms Jirat Wachirasereechai APCD info@apcdproject.org
3 Ms Phatcharamont Phanthong APCD phatcharamont@apcdproject.org
4 Ms Lasapan Toomsawasdi APCD lasapan@apcdproject.org
5 Mr Hisao Chiba APCD chiba@apcdproject.org
6 Mr Pat Watanasin Ministry of Social Development and Human Security patwatanasin@yahoo.com
7 Mr Pecharat Techavachara FEPB fepb@internetksc.th.com
8 Mr Bryan Woodford Yooralla Society of Victoria ceo@yooralla.com.au
9 Ms Kay Nagata UNESCAP nagata@un.org
10 Mr Monthian Buntan TAB mbuntan@tab.or.th

 

Annex II (d)

Women with disabilities (WWD)

The Task Force on Women with Disabilities was held on 1 December 2004, attended by 8 participants, and chaired by Aiko Akiyama. A provisional list of participants is attached.

1. The Chairperson presented the provisional agenda as follows:

  1. Opening
  2. Introduction of participants
  3. Adoption of minutes of the previous meeting
  4. Reports on relevant activities to date
    4.1 From the chairperson:
    1) A report on Asia-Pacific NGO Forum 2004 on Beijing+10
    2) A report of the High-level Intergovernmental Meeting to Review Regional Implementation of the Beijing Platform for Action and its Regional and Global Outcomes.
    3) A report on WWD Asia-Pacific Network

    4.2 From participants:
    1) An e-report from Australia
    2) An e-report from India on "Equity of Women with Disabilities in India"
    3) Reports from other participants
  5. Action plans for year 2005 and others
  6. Other matters:
    - Selection of new task force coordinator on WWD
  7. Closing

The participants approved this agenda.

2. The Chairperson reported on the Asia-Pacific NGO Forum 2004 on Beijing+10, held at Mahidol University, Bangkok, 30 June -3 July 2004. Task Force members participated and a submitted a summary statement of issues of women with disabilities and a set of recommendations. The participants of the Task Force pointed out that follow up action to make and to implement its action plan would be important.

3. The Chairperson reported on the achievement made at the High-level Intergovernmental Meeting to Review Regional Implementation of the Beijing Platform for Action, held Bangkok, 7-9 September 2004. The immediate objectives were to raise awareness on issues on disabled women amongst policy-makers in gender development field and to reflect their concerns in an expected outcome document, which in turn, was expected to be brought up in a discussion table at the Commission on the Status of Women, to be held in New York in March 2005. The Meeting was attended by more than 400 policy makers and experts from 44 member states in the Asian and Pacific region.

Three representatives from the Task Force (blind, physically disabled, non-disabled women) participated in, read the Statement (which was formulated by the Task Force)), and distributed a Statement by women with disabilities in the Pacific region at the Meeting (please see the attached statement). In the outcome report, a specific paragraph was inserted on women with disabilities. It described deprivation of self-esteem faced by women with disabilities from early childhood and access to health services, and CEDAW disability-specific General Recommendations #18 and #24. This insertion was made possible thanks to lobbying done by the Task Force participants to the Government participants of Thailand and Pakistan.

The Task Force agreed that the through this occasion, members have done a reasonably good job; but felt a need for more participation of WWD or PWD in this type of meeting or any type of disability non-specific meeting held at UN and elsewhere. WWD issues are generally unrecognized for various reasons. The Task Force reaffirmed the importance of taking actions to influence gender policy makers, and agreed upon the following action plans;

  1. Ms Nareewan, newly elected Chair of RI in the AP region, will approach Thai National Council on Women on the TF activities and discusses possible joint activities such as for the International Women’s Day (8March);
  2. Ms Farida continues to work with women’s community in Bangladesh and sends a new movie on WWD to the TF for future activities;
  3. Ms Nareewan will ensure sustainable development of a subcommittee on WWD within the structure of RI Asia and the Pacific, and will include a thematic session on WWD at the RI Asia and Pacific regional conference (to be held 29 November to 2 December 2006).

4. The Task Force members discussed other advocacy venues (i.e., sending a questionnaire to candidates prior to Thai election on WWD issues).

5. Participation in online chat at a DPI site and a Women Watch site was encouraged. The addresses are as follows: http://www.dpi.org/en/resources/topics/women/11-18-04_beijing.htm, http://www.un.org/womenwatch/forums/review/

6. The Task Force members raise the following issues as important agenda for future activities:

  1. Actions have to be taken on concerns and support needs of mothers (fathers) of disabled family members;
  2. Dissemination of information on online basis is really important. Sending information on this TF should be sent to a site such as Women Watch.
  3. Women in rural areas lack access to this kind of information.
  4. Pensions for (WWD) are used by other family members other than herself.

7. The Task Force members agreed that Ms Farida Yesmin, Executive Director, Disabled Rehabilitation & Research Association (DRRA), Bangladesh, will be a new coordinator of the TF on a condition that she comes once a year.

8. The meeting was adjourned.

Appendix 1

Statement for High-level Intergovernmental Meeting to Review Regional Implementation of the Beijing Platform for Action and its Regional and Global Outcomes
7-10 September 2004
by


Task Force on Women with Disabilities Thematic Working Group on Disability-related Concerns (TWG-DC)

On behalf of the Task Force on Women with Disabilities of the Thematic Working Group on Disability-related Concerns (TWG-DC), we would like to share concerns of women with disabilities with all of the distinguished participants at High-level Intergovernmental Meeting to Review Regional Implementation of the Beijing Platform of Action and its Regional and Global Outcomes. The Task Force is composed by representatives of the Governments, NGOs and concerned United Nations agencies, aimed at promoting the implementation of the Biwako Millennium Framework towards an Inclusive, Barrier-free and rights-based Society (BMF), the regional policy-guideline for the 2nd Asian and Pacific Decade of Disabled Persons (2003-2012), especially, from the view points of women with disabilities.

Women and girls with disabilities face double jeopardy through their status as women and as a person with disabilities. They continued to be excluded from access to health care, social protection schemes, education, employment and enjoyment of all human rights. According to the BMF, in the Asian and Pacific region, an estimated 400 million persons with disabilities live, of which more than 40 per cent live in poverty and less than 10 percent have access to any form of education. In many countries, unemployment rate of persons with disabilities are 70 per cent. Though they are no region wide gender –specific data available in these regards, one can imagine the extent of conditions women and girls live in this region.

Women with disabilities face many barriers in realizing their potential. From childhood, many of them are deprived of their self-determination, become victims of domestic violence, sexual abuse in institution and work place. They were denied of family life. Until not so long ago, it was not so uncommon to hear of forced sterilization of them, and not given any reproductive care. Maternal rights of disabled women have been denied due to their disability. Because of disability, many women cannot get job even when they are qualified. There are few representatives of women with disabilities both in women’s organizations and disabled people’s organizations. Certain cultural practices might increase the risk of causing disabilities in women.

To solve the problems, mainstreaming of disabled women’s issues in disability policy and projects, mainstreaming of their issues in women’s policy and projects, empowerment of women with disabilities, and demystifying stereotypes against women with disabilities are essential at the national, regional and international levels. Establishing reliable data on different areas of disabled women’s life would support these efforts.

General Recommendation #18 of the Convention of the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Woman (CEDAW) mentions need to take measures in the areas of employment, education, health services and social security for disabled women. Its General Recommendation 24 mentions special attention to health needs and rights of women with disabilities. The target 3 of the Biwako Millennium Framework, mentioned above, call Governments in the region to ensure, by 2005, anti-discrimination measures including women with disabilities, and the Target 5 calls for national mainstream women’s associations to include, by 2005, women with disabilities as members. We should like to share that fact that, currently, a Comprehensive and Integral International Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Rights and Dignity of Persons with Disabilities are formulated, and issues of women with disabilities are concerns of many Governments and NGOs.

We, members of the Task Force on Women with Disabilities, would like to call for further commitments of Governments, in collaboration with NGOs and UN agencies, to better life of women with disabilities. We hope the final outcome document of this Meeting will include these concerns mentioned here, and these concerns become more visible both at the regional and international arenas. Thank you very much.

Websites for reference:

Asian and Pacific Decade of Disabled Persons, 2003-2012, Biwako Millennium Framework http://www.unescap.org/esid/psis/disability/index.asp

Human Rights and Disability
http://www.sre.gob.mx/discapacidad/paperunhchr.htm

Women with disabilities
http://www.worldenable.net/women

International Convention on disability
http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/enable/rights/adhoccom.htm

Please contact Ms Supattraporn Tanatikom (Chairperson of the Task Force on Women with Disabilities) at sarahmai@ksc.th.com or Ms Aiko Akiyama at akiyama@un.org (Coordinator for the Task Force, UNESCAP) for further questions and comments.

List of the Participants

No.
Name
Organization
Email address
1 Ms Farida Yesmin
DRRA sila@dhaka.agni.com
2 Ms Shushira Chonhenchob HI bkkdd@thailand-hi.org
3 Ms Treeyarak Meebutpakdee VSO Thailand treeyarak@inet.co.th